Family & Relationships0 min ago
Should We Be Rationing Health Care For Fatties And Smokers?
24 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/av /uk-pol itics-4 1988545 /should -health care-be -ration ed-for- patient s-who-s moke-or -are-ob ese
On the basis that more or less any sort of health care need can be put down as "self inflicted" it may surprise many of you that I think not.
On the basis that more or less any sort of health care need can be put down as "self inflicted" it may surprise many of you that I think not.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Agree with OG and Pixie. Human frailties and all that, lifestyle today brought about by other means...isn't always the 'victim' at fault IMO. So if you pay into the system, it's for each of those who do and NOT for those who don't.....as in some foreigners and scroungers. That's the way it should go....well IMO anyway.
I wonder where the line is drawn....pregnancy, for example, is a lifestyle choice....there are many in the population who do not have children yet still pay the full amount into the coffers... Driving puts people at risk of accidents that demand medical care as do quite a few sports......I do not think differentiation can be made along the lines of lifestyle. I say this as a non driver with no children ....I am happy to pay what is asked of me for the benefit of all...surely that is what the NHS was developed for....
Actually I am probably going to go against popular opinion and say yes. To a degree it should be rationed.
For illnesses as a direct result of smoking or being obese then if treatment is had then they should give up smoking and/or lose and significant amount of weight.
Alcoholics don't get new livers unless they kick the drink. The same should be for fatties and smokers. If you push me I will also say that people who deliberately put themselves in danger should be made to pay as well. Rock climber and dangerous sports people should have insurance.
For illnesses as a direct result of smoking or being obese then if treatment is had then they should give up smoking and/or lose and significant amount of weight.
Alcoholics don't get new livers unless they kick the drink. The same should be for fatties and smokers. If you push me I will also say that people who deliberately put themselves in danger should be made to pay as well. Rock climber and dangerous sports people should have insurance.
Blimey, I must be going soft. I agree with Baldric @ 17:05...
Ah well credit where its due!
This is a slippery slope though, if health care is rationed for 'fatties and smokers' where does it stop?
Ive just come back from an appointment with mental health care, maybe I should be less mental in order to qualify for treatment?
Ah well credit where its due!
This is a slippery slope though, if health care is rationed for 'fatties and smokers' where does it stop?
Ive just come back from an appointment with mental health care, maybe I should be less mental in order to qualify for treatment?
If there is no 'rationing' for smokers and the obese then there should be no rationing at all. Any and every health condition should be paid for to the highest degree regardless of resources or priority.
I have saggy skin. It's a health issue because I don't like it hanging there and it makes me sad.
I have saggy skin. It's a health issue because I don't like it hanging there and it makes me sad.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.