Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 24rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
And how will they afford it?
Jus looking at the map of Yemen, and it is unlikely starving Yemenis would be able to escape the country and come here. They are surrounded by the sea and their enemies, so they aren’t going anywhere fast.

http://static2.uk.businessinsider.com/image/55143ecddd08958e2d8b460c-937-740/screenshot%202015-03-26%2013.01.39.png
nowt to do with us, EU law is quite clear, first safe country, end of.
If only TTT, If only.
Well if May & Co pulled their collective finger out that may well be the case TTT. However with the traitors trying their best to derail the will of the people they will probably be welcomed here with houses cars and benefits. And sod the indigenous population of course.
‘Refugees seeking reunification in Germany announce hunger strike’

Mmm.
Question Author
By 2050, the bulk of the world's population growth will take place in Africa: of the additional 2.4 billion people projected between 2015 and 2050, 1.3 billion will be added in Africa, - ( 1.3 billion !!!!) 0.9 billion in Asia and only 0.2 billion in the rest of the world.
Given that within the continent of Africa, starvation is already so prevalent and with such an increase in population and without payment of heed to the theories of population growth of Thomas Malthus;
http://cgge.aag.org/PopulationandNaturalResources1e/CF_PopNatRes_Jan10/CF_PopNatRes_Jan108.html

Millions of starving peoples will head for the nearest food sources and Europe will be high on the list, unchecked, they will simply 'come and get us' in such numbers that the armed forces will be incapable of resisting them and we can then all starve together.
I believe killing machines have come on leaps and bounds since 1798, Khandro.
If it comes to it. while it won't be pretty, I think Europe will stand, political will dependant.
//Millions of starving peoples will head for the nearest food sources and Europe will be high on the list, unchecked, they will simply 'come and get us' in such numbers that the armed forces will be incapable of resisting them and we can then all starve together.//
Did they just sack you as a script writer from 'Walking Dead' or something Khandro? Seriously do get a grip. Read that back and see how absurd that sounds.
I don't know what "Walking Dead" is, Klavidir. Is it a something you've worked in?
No it isn't, but it is one of the biggest grossing TV series ever, try looking it up. Google is your friend.
Question Author
Klavadir, Scoff if you like, but the population of Africa doubling by 2050 is considered as a fact , with so many starving now, how do you think these masses are going to be fed?
Africa is full of fertile land they should be able to feed themselves if they could get civilised.
sounds positively grim..
I’m not sure they could ever feed themselves TTT. Their level of breeding will probably always outweigh the amount of food they could produce.
Saw a report (possibly yesterday, possibly António Guterres) where he said that climate change was the biggest threat to the planet.
I don’t believe that, I think breeding in Africa and the Middle East is a far greater threat.
Question Author
I know there are all sorts of things one can find to worry about, but younger generations than some of us, have never known anything but plenty and think that supermarket shelves must always be full, without realising how tenuous the whole thing is. Millions and millions died and starved in Europe in the last century, even I, am no stranger to hunger. In WWII Britain attempted to feed itself "Dig for Victory" was a help but it was nowhere near enough even with a much smaller population.
I agree with you Bigbad. It always surprises me when " refugees" are shown with their babies and toddlers born in the camps or on the road. Why have babies in those circumstances?
Yes, Samuraisan.
And babies born in some war-torn country, too.
"I don’t believe that, I think breeding in Africa and the Middle East is a far greater threat."

I have said repeatedly that so-called "Climate Change" (or whatever name the latest figures justify calling "weather") will be a stroll in the park compared to the population crisis. The forecast population growth for Africa is truly horrendous. The people there seem to think that because many of their children die of malnutrition and disease the answer is to knock out more of them. Rather like insisting that cats continue to have kittens because many of them end up in sacks at the bottom of the canal.

It truly puzzles me why people should want to have children in an area of the world rife with poverty, disease, hunger war. "Beyond stupid" does not quite adequately describe it. Europe is at risk from this threat (as is currently evident) and it will simply worsen - especially with the policies of "humanitarianism" (i.e appeasement) demonstrated by most European politicians.
Question Author
I don't think they particularly want them all, at the end of the day bonking is the problem, tell the men that they should stop and good luck!

1 to 20 of 24rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Second Wave Of Refugees On Their Way

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.