ChatterBank1 min ago
Just What Did They Expect?
32 Answers
And why do we have to pamper to it?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-51 19791/T he-food -far-We stern-c omplain -detain ed-migr ants.ht ml#comm ents
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ./A report by Peter Clarke, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, said: ‘The food that we sampled was adequate, but most dishes comprised Western-style food and the menu lacked cultural diversity. The lunchtime meal consisted largely of baguettes or salad. There was very little in any of the menus to reflect the normal diets of, for example, Chinese or African women.’
Food should be suited to the ‘religious and cultural needs’ of detainees, said the report for HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP). Menus should ‘reflect the diverse needs of the population’.
However, managers were praised for preparing meals suitable for vegetarians, vegans and those with halal diets. Detainees also had access to kitchens where they could cook their own food.//
.
Food should be suited to the ‘religious and cultural needs’ of detainees, said the report", and "Menus should ‘reflect the diverse needs of the population'".
Why? If they were particularly bothered by these trivia then, presumably, the detainees (the population?) wouldn't have chosen to leave the country where their "needs" were properly catered for.
Is there a flaw in that line of reasoning?
Food should be suited to the ‘religious and cultural needs’ of detainees, said the report for HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP). Menus should ‘reflect the diverse needs of the population’.
However, managers were praised for preparing meals suitable for vegetarians, vegans and those with halal diets. Detainees also had access to kitchens where they could cook their own food.//
.
Food should be suited to the ‘religious and cultural needs’ of detainees, said the report", and "Menus should ‘reflect the diverse needs of the population'".
Why? If they were particularly bothered by these trivia then, presumably, the detainees (the population?) wouldn't have chosen to leave the country where their "needs" were properly catered for.
Is there a flaw in that line of reasoning?
The report also says that they were given(given mind with free access to the phone systems) mobile phones to enable them to contact family and friends. We must be mad. "Hi Mum it's lovely here all free and they let us moan about everything. Drop everything and get here. Tell everybody to do the same it's a piece of cake. Gonna complain about this phone though, I fancy one of the latest models."
//Wonder what they were eating as they made their ways across the World to get here? Did they complain in the EU about the lack of culinary diversity?//
This question highlights the contradiction implicit in the report: diversity is not about sameness, it's about difference[i, isn't it? Their European travels have introduced the detainees to a wide variety of foods, all those French cheeses, all those Italian pastas, and now a boring English salas. The approved wisdom has always been that this is a [i]good] thing, not something to be excoriated. If European societies are enriched and strengthened by all this diversity, then presumably Afghans and Eritreans must benefit from it too. (And if not, why not?)
When Blair and co decided to make Britain multicultural and (in the famous phrase) "rub [our] noses in diversity" we were told then not to complain. So we ought not hear complaints now from (or on behalf of) others about having diversity "thrust down [their] throats".
This question highlights the contradiction implicit in the report: diversity is not about sameness, it's about difference[i, isn't it? Their European travels have introduced the detainees to a wide variety of foods, all those French cheeses, all those Italian pastas, and now a boring English salas. The approved wisdom has always been that this is a [i]good] thing, not something to be excoriated. If European societies are enriched and strengthened by all this diversity, then presumably Afghans and Eritreans must benefit from it too. (And if not, why not?)
When Blair and co decided to make Britain multicultural and (in the famous phrase) "rub [our] noses in diversity" we were told then not to complain. So we ought not hear complaints now from (or on behalf of) others about having diversity "thrust down [their] throats".