ChatterBank2 mins ago
David Davis Contempt Of Parliament
The Government commissioned research into the impact of Brexit on 58 sectors of British Industry. Parliament voted to see the reports in a binding vote. Instead of delivering the 58 reports, Davis gave them one report which apparently was highly redacted. MPs (of all parties) are not happy and believe Davis has not fulfilled the wishes of Parliament.
Presumably the 58 reports are not good or Davis would not be so eager to suppress them.
Two questions:
1. Should Parliament (and we the public) have a right to know how British Industry will be affected ?
2. If Davis is found to be in Contempt of Parliament, is his position as chief negotiator on behalf of the British Government still tenable ?
Presumably the 58 reports are not good or Davis would not be so eager to suppress them.
Two questions:
1. Should Parliament (and we the public) have a right to know how British Industry will be affected ?
2. If Davis is found to be in Contempt of Parliament, is his position as chief negotiator on behalf of the British Government still tenable ?
Answers
"...he is implementing the democratic will of the majority, that is a higher authority in my opinion." It may be your opinion but it's still wrong. Parliament is the supreme authority in the UK, and has been since essentially the 17th Century. While it was correct for Parliament to vote through Article 50 legislation that doesn't mean that they were obliged...
10:51 Tue 28th Nov 2017
Jim, //if Parliament passes on instructions then it is incumbent on Government to carry them out.//
I refer you back to my post at 12:52 Tue. //Parliament agreed some time ago that sensitive material should be withheld.//
Round in circles again and it's becoming tedious. What happens will happen. You carry on if you like, but I'm off to chat about something more interesting. Plenty of Royal Wedding threads to choose from. ;o)
I refer you back to my post at 12:52 Tue. //Parliament agreed some time ago that sensitive material should be withheld.//
Round in circles again and it's becoming tedious. What happens will happen. You carry on if you like, but I'm off to chat about something more interesting. Plenty of Royal Wedding threads to choose from. ;o)
I replied to that already. Any such vote can be easily overridden by a later one. This is what happened here. Parliament voted to request, or demand, or instruct, government to release this analysis. That overrides anything that came before it. Because that's how Parliament works.
It's interesting to note -- in particular with regards to the case over whether an Act of Parliament was needed to authorise Government to trigger Article 50 -- that many of those who voted to take back control and give it to Parliament seem the least aware of what powers Parliament has, and how it works.
Do keep up, Naomi. :P
It's interesting to note -- in particular with regards to the case over whether an Act of Parliament was needed to authorise Government to trigger Article 50 -- that many of those who voted to take back control and give it to Parliament seem the least aware of what powers Parliament has, and how it works.
Do keep up, Naomi. :P
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.