News4 mins ago
I Think He Likes Power
18 Answers
Answers
"I have never understood the logic behind it. If the people want someone to serve a third term, why not? " Not a view I might have agreed with until this time round :-)
16:07 Wed 06th Dec 2017
The American system is "only two terms full stop"
The Russian system was (and still is) "two consecutive terms"
What he also did was get the nodding dogs of the Duma to extend the presidential term to 6 years from 4 (they don't bother with referendums) - the first 6 year term is about to expire
Anyway, not sure this is even "news". He can't really not stand, as the whole rotten system would collapse without him.
I wonder how many votes he got and where they have stored the result for safe keeping.
And will Xenia Sobchak be this year's "authenticity" candidate alongside Zyuganov and Zhirinovsky
The Russian system was (and still is) "two consecutive terms"
What he also did was get the nodding dogs of the Duma to extend the presidential term to 6 years from 4 (they don't bother with referendums) - the first 6 year term is about to expire
Anyway, not sure this is even "news". He can't really not stand, as the whole rotten system would collapse without him.
I wonder how many votes he got and where they have stored the result for safe keeping.
And will Xenia Sobchak be this year's "authenticity" candidate alongside Zyuganov and Zhirinovsky
From wikipedia:
Tenure and term limits
Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected to four terms before the adoption of the Twenty-second Amendment in 1951.
"The term of office for president and vice president is four years. George Washington, the first president, set an unofficial precedent of serving only two terms. Before Franklin D. Roosevelt, Ulysses S. Grant and Theodore Roosevelt each unsuccessfully sought a third term. In 1940, Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected to a third term after being "drafted" by his party. In 1941, the United States entered World War II, leading voters to elect Roosevelt to a fourth term in 1944. Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945, 82 days into his fourth term.
After the war, and in response to Roosevelt being elected to third and fourth terms, the Twenty-second Amendment was adopted. The amendment bars anyone from being elected president more than twice, or once if that person served more than half of another president's term. Harry S. Truman, president when this amendment was adopted, was exempted from its limitations and briefly sought a third (a second full) term before withdrawing from the 1952 election."
So the 28th Amendment only stipulates two terms. One president did serve non-consecutive terms (Grover Cleveland?) tho that was before the current rules anyway
Tenure and term limits
Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected to four terms before the adoption of the Twenty-second Amendment in 1951.
"The term of office for president and vice president is four years. George Washington, the first president, set an unofficial precedent of serving only two terms. Before Franklin D. Roosevelt, Ulysses S. Grant and Theodore Roosevelt each unsuccessfully sought a third term. In 1940, Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected to a third term after being "drafted" by his party. In 1941, the United States entered World War II, leading voters to elect Roosevelt to a fourth term in 1944. Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945, 82 days into his fourth term.
After the war, and in response to Roosevelt being elected to third and fourth terms, the Twenty-second Amendment was adopted. The amendment bars anyone from being elected president more than twice, or once if that person served more than half of another president's term. Harry S. Truman, president when this amendment was adopted, was exempted from its limitations and briefly sought a third (a second full) term before withdrawing from the 1952 election."
So the 28th Amendment only stipulates two terms. One president did serve non-consecutive terms (Grover Cleveland?) tho that was before the current rules anyway
I think that's the issue, Jack, ~IF the people want their leader to stand again, then fine.
Surely it shouldn't just be up to the leader tho, to decide that he/she is going to carry on -
why on earth am I reminded of Julius Caesar?
didn't he decide he was going to be carrying on ad infinitum but was stopped?
(history isn't my strong suit)
Surely it shouldn't just be up to the leader tho, to decide that he/she is going to carry on -
why on earth am I reminded of Julius Caesar?
didn't he decide he was going to be carrying on ad infinitum but was stopped?
(history isn't my strong suit)