ChatterBank4 mins ago
Labour’S First Transgender Women’S Officer
A 19-year-old political activist, who is hoping to become the first transgender MP, was elected to the position in Rochester and Strood last month.
“No woman has the experience to be representative of all women,” says Lily Madigan, but Lily Madigan doesn’t have the experience to be representative of any woman.
Right on, Labour!!
Is anyone surprised that the appointment has sparked a bitter row among some in the Labour party and the press?
http:// www.the week.co .uk/901 54/the- teen-ho ping-to -become -the-fi rst-tra nsgende r-mp
“No woman has the experience to be representative of all women,” says Lily Madigan, but Lily Madigan doesn’t have the experience to be representative of any woman.
Right on, Labour!!
Is anyone surprised that the appointment has sparked a bitter row among some in the Labour party and the press?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
There are plenty of ugly women. I don't think it's especially fair (or dignified, or rational, frankly) to attack Madigan over whether or not she looks good.
The question is - are the people she is supposed to be representing in this one minor locality satisfied that she can do it? Evidently yes. What's the problem?
The question is - are the people she is supposed to be representing in this one minor locality satisfied that she can do it? Evidently yes. What's the problem?
//I agree, my own view is that no one should be allowed to stand as a candidate unless they have held down a real job for at least 5 years. //
Seems a bit redundant in a constituency-based system. If pre-parliamentary life is a big decider for you (and doubtless others), why not just be content that you can vote based on that if you wish and let everyone else vote on other criteria if they want to?
Seems a bit redundant in a constituency-based system. If pre-parliamentary life is a big decider for you (and doubtless others), why not just be content that you can vote based on that if you wish and let everyone else vote on other criteria if they want to?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.