Body & Soul0 min ago
Should Hillary Run Again......or Take Up Knitting?
34 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.She 's toast - the uranium scandal puts paid to any ambitions in that direction.
https:/ /www.in vestors .com/po litics/ clinton -founda tion-sc andal/
https:/
Clinton should not run again. She was a poor candidate who came with a lot of baggage.
The knitting comment was a joke and was not a serious suggestion. A bit sexist because none of the other failed Presidental candidates were urged to knit instead.
Vanity Fair has apologised but the bad publicity will have done it harm.
Amusing that Trump got his magazines mixed up and attacked the wrong one. Par for the course.
The knitting comment was a joke and was not a serious suggestion. A bit sexist because none of the other failed Presidental candidates were urged to knit instead.
Vanity Fair has apologised but the bad publicity will have done it harm.
Amusing that Trump got his magazines mixed up and attacked the wrong one. Par for the course.
Don’t apologise jourdain. It’s bad enough having belittling remarks like that without then being told you have no sense of humour.
BTW maybe that list of ‘who Clinton blames’ may be another 5 out of 10 attempt at humour for all I know, but the inclusion of Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders on there is a bit desperate.
Who is it Clinton blames most for defeat? Boringly enough the answer actually is: Clinton.
BTW maybe that list of ‘who Clinton blames’ may be another 5 out of 10 attempt at humour for all I know, but the inclusion of Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders on there is a bit desperate.
Who is it Clinton blames most for defeat? Boringly enough the answer actually is: Clinton.
Khandro.
The Uranium One accusations are debunked here.
https:/ /www.sn opes.co m/hilla ry-clin ton-ura nium-ru ssia-de al/
1. Clinton had no power to veto or approve the selling of the Uranium company.
2. The lion’s share of Donations were made from the company by one individual, several years before a Russian company acquired it.
3. No significant amounts of Uranium were exported, and certainly not to Russia.
The Uranium One accusations are debunked here.
https:/
1. Clinton had no power to veto or approve the selling of the Uranium company.
2. The lion’s share of Donations were made from the company by one individual, several years before a Russian company acquired it.
3. No significant amounts of Uranium were exported, and certainly not to Russia.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.