To be fair, I have pictures of someone who is currently facing sexual assault charges - one is against a minor. I have neither put them on my mantelpiece nor sought them out to destroy them. If I come across them, I will put them in the bin. Until then, yes, guilty as charged.
I don't know NoM but I heard a Jonathan King song on the radio once because I remarked upon it and googled it to check that I wasn't wrong when I came home, so same point.
JTH, that's an unjust and paranoid statement. I would be aghast at anyone keeping a signed photo of Worboys. Please stop trying to demonise people for their opinions and beliefs.
I've got some Jonathan King songs on my iPod (never did like Gary Glitter's music) - but playing them doesn't fill me with lust for underage teenagers, nor finance his further activities.
I don't get why a woman would even admit to possessing a signed photo of a convicted rapist? Nothing to do with 'knocking lumps' of someone. I genuinely don't get it.
Is rape a horrific crime or is it not?
I can barely think of anything worse except child porn.
Gary Glitter was convicted though. Jackson wasn't. I have seen some TV commercials in the US where they use Gary Glitter songs. I always think "If only you knew"
Yes, rape is abhorrent.
Islay has already said that she has the photo 'somewhere', not in pride of place.
islay is also free to state that she has a photoof him, if she wants.....
Anything else is your own personal reaction to that comment and notsomething for which she can be held responsible.
//Well Nailit I don't get why you are surprised at this as you have already told me that I enjoy torturing animals//
Do you deny it?
Anyway, that has nothing to do with this post does it? Don't want to detract from the OP.
;-)
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.