When Are We Going To Start Prosecuting The Lying Women?

[youngmafbog]

Yet another one falsely accused, and evidence held back by the Police and yet she enjoys anonymity whilst his reputation is tarnished forever (You will always get the idiotic no smoke no fire brigade)

Heads need to start rolling.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5331961/Engineer-spent-three-months-jail-false-rape-claim.html

[ToraToraTora]

soon I hope, this is not doing the real cases any favours. I'd also replace the entire CPS who are now politically motivated.

[bhg481]

Absolutely, these women are on a hiding-to-nothing. Pure malice with no come-back.

[ToraToraTora]

we should also start prosecuting the police and CPS for withholding evidence and perverting the course of justice. It's disgusting that women have been given a potent weapon against men with no come backs. Again the genuine cases will suffer.

[mikey4444]

YMB....as I understand it, if someone makes false claims, then they could be in for a charge of conspiracy, which I can recall New Judge explaining in the distant past, was a very serious offence.

In the case of this poor young man, I hope Plod is urgently interviewing his accuser as we type, although I shan't be at all surprised if she gets off scot-free.

[douglas9401]

The police can be very impressive but too much of the time are found to be lazy, arrogant, complacent, disorganised and uninterested.

As to anonimity for women, it flies in the face of 'equality' requirements in every other field and is an affront to justice.

If I was this poor beggar I'd be down the printers supervising production of posters to shame the evil, lying witch.

[ToraToraTora]

The will no doubt, quite rightly sue for compo and the public purse as ever takes another hit. Can someone tell me why we are not prosecuting these lying misandrists?

[youngmafbog]

Exactly TTT, it is the genuine cases that will suffer greatly because of this, plus we won't be getting the real rapists of our streets so they will continue to do it.

[youngmafbog]

Yes Mickey, but we never even see the accusers named do we let alone prosecuted for a serious crime? That is what I am on about using existing law to bring these women to book.

[Spicerack]

'We're' rewarding them instead.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5332859/Woman-branded-fantasist-gets-role-sex-abuse-inquiry.html#comments

[Gromit]

The gist of the problem is that the police are not disclosing information to the defence. And that probably results in a better successful prosecution in the past (because the prosection was cheating).

We are hearing about these cases because phone messages have two trails, one sent and one receiving. So the failure to reveal the evidence of the messages was easy to detect.

It makes you wonder how much evidence in other cases other than rape, are not being revealed.

If the system is unjust, then that is a very serious problem, and needs to be rectified urgently.

[mikey4444]

YMB...personally, I think the anonymity of rape victims should be preserved.

But if it transpires subsequently, that they have lied, then that anonymity should be removed.

[Togo]

//Professor Jay’s inquiry which, you might be interested to learn, is spending £1 million of public money on an advertising campaign . . . to find more alleged victims.//

Ergo, more people falsely accused and large ones all round for the boys and girls in the bubble. Protect the accusers at all costs they are your livelihood.

[jno]

crime's up 14% in the last year (England and Wales) while police numbers have been cut. Yet you expect the same sort of service from fewer police?

[ToraToraTora]

at least make the accused anonymous too.

[dannyk13]

jno, What has that got to do with withholding evidence?

[Togo]

Or allocating the resources that they do have to politically motivated witch hunts against patently innocent people?

[ToraToraTora]

no jno I expect them to do the basics.

[mikey4444]

While I agree with jno, as regards to the falling numbers of Police, Danny has a point.

Its a combination of incompetency and sharp practise that has brought about the problem of non-disclosure.

And its as much Plods fault, as it is the CPS.

[jno]

dannyk, we don't know that the evidence was deliberately withheld. It's just as likely that it was overlooked. Remember that police have to wade through vastly more evidence than they used to, with tweets, text messages and FB posts greatly increasing the burden; but there are fewer police to do it. It's inevitable that things will go wrong.

[dannyk13]

jno,in my experience (22 years in the force) if any cuts are to be made the last people that will be affected is clerical staff which, by the way, normally includes a lot of civilian staff.