Motoring8 mins ago
Finally Germany Starts To Fight Back
Robinson exposes the media for what they are and suggests they have blood on their hands, because of their left biased reporting. These people protesting aren't knuckle-dragging skinheads as you can see in the video, they are simply ordinary Germans who have had enough.
The tide is turning; also this morning, Horst Seehofer of the Bavarian CSU gave a blistering speech attacking the head-in-the-sand government and Merkel's leadership in Berlin.
We've had the Arab Spring, will this be the German Summer?
The tide is turning; also this morning, Horst Seehofer of the Bavarian CSU gave a blistering speech attacking the head-in-the-sand government and Merkel's leadership in Berlin.
We've had the Arab Spring, will this be the German Summer?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Finally Germany Starts To Fight Back
We've had the Arab Spring, will this be the German Summer?
So the entire western world media has an "agenda" but not Tommy Robinson.
Good old Tommy, tells it like it is.
Hilarious.
It is high time Answerbank stopped people sharing links to the BBC, CNN, Sky, etc etc etc and only allowed youtube videos by the guardians of The Truth :-)
Does that one?
We've had the Arab Spring, will this be the German Summer?
So the entire western world media has an "agenda" but not Tommy Robinson.
Good old Tommy, tells it like it is.
Hilarious.
It is high time Answerbank stopped people sharing links to the BBC, CNN, Sky, etc etc etc and only allowed youtube videos by the guardians of The Truth :-)
Does that one?
"So the entire western world media has an "agenda" but not Tommy Robinson. "
Er, well given the first line of the OP reads: "Robinson exposes the media for what they are " and given it was old khanders himself who broached the subject of Boris and his speech. Then it seem to go into an episode of "Who Do You Think You Are?" (!)
Er, well given the first line of the OP reads: "Robinson exposes the media for what they are " and given it was old khanders himself who broached the subject of Boris and his speech. Then it seem to go into an episode of "Who Do You Think You Are?" (!)
BBC fake news there
.
BTW I didn't bother watching Q.Time last night having seen it comprised of yet another remainer-packed panel along with its obligatory remainer biased chairman;
https:/ /order- order.c om/2018 /02/15/ whos-qu estion- time-to night-2 8/#disq us_thre ad
.
BTW I didn't bother watching Q.Time last night having seen it comprised of yet another remainer-packed panel along with its obligatory remainer biased chairman;
https:/
At the risk of going too far into details...
1) we don't know the edit was made in the original broadcast and not by the person uploading the video. It looks more like the latter to me because the images don't match the aspect ratio of the report.
2) the reporter describes "a push and a shove with the police and somehow she ended up on the tracks." This is inaccurate, which we know because Sky happened to have a camera on the incident - which the BBC presumably did not. It is far more likely that the reporter is describing what he heard on the ground (and garbled via the translators he has with him) having not seen the incident with his own eyes.
I'm not sure this is terribly compelling evidence of grand-scale deception.
I also don't buy into this idea that all "Western media" (?) is part of some grand liberal conspiracy. That is the language of crackpots.
(Cue speculative disparagement of my relatives).
1) we don't know the edit was made in the original broadcast and not by the person uploading the video. It looks more like the latter to me because the images don't match the aspect ratio of the report.
2) the reporter describes "a push and a shove with the police and somehow she ended up on the tracks." This is inaccurate, which we know because Sky happened to have a camera on the incident - which the BBC presumably did not. It is far more likely that the reporter is describing what he heard on the ground (and garbled via the translators he has with him) having not seen the incident with his own eyes.
I'm not sure this is terribly compelling evidence of grand-scale deception.
I also don't buy into this idea that all "Western media" (?) is part of some grand liberal conspiracy. That is the language of crackpots.
(Cue speculative disparagement of my relatives).
All that video proves is that someone has the ability to make a piece of sky news footage segue on the back of a piece of BBC footage: except that it’s the same thing repeated. I’ve no idea who is telling lies, but how interesting that we seem prepared to accept someone's edited YouTube video as gospel with no possible idea of who is responsible for it.
I hope you have had your rabies jabs kromo ;-)
I’ve been accused of being some sort of fifth columnist merely for suggesting that Tommy Robinson may not be a more reliable correspondent than the BBC France 24 and the entire western news media.
In a moment someone will be along to proclaim RT and Press TV as the godfathers of reputable journalism. It’s a wacky world
I’ve been accused of being some sort of fifth columnist merely for suggesting that Tommy Robinson may not be a more reliable correspondent than the BBC France 24 and the entire western news media.
In a moment someone will be along to proclaim RT and Press TV as the godfathers of reputable journalism. It’s a wacky world
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.