Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Should Women Disclose If They Are Pregnant During Job Interviews?
Personally I think yes.
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ world/2 018/feb /19/uk- bosses- believe -women- should- say-at- intervi ew-if-t hey-are -pregna nt-repo rt
How frustrating would it be to have a job offer accepted and then upon starting the job and the training involved to be told a years worth of maternity leave will soon be taken.
https:/
How frustrating would it be to have a job offer accepted and then upon starting the job and the training involved to be told a years worth of maternity leave will soon be taken.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Deskdiary. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Naomi..what disturbs me is that the implication of some posts seems to mean that it OK to deny women the chance of work and a career, just because they might become pregnant at some time in the future.
You said that you would have understood if you had been denied a job, because you were of child-bearing age.
I wonder how far your "understanding" would have lasted, if you had been denied the 10th job that you had applied for that week, for that very reason ?
You said that you would have understood if you had been denied a job, because you were of child-bearing age.
I wonder how far your "understanding" would have lasted, if you had been denied the 10th job that you had applied for that week, for that very reason ?
I don 't think it is unreasonable for a pregnant woman to inform her prospective employers at interview stage.
This would mean that the employer will have all pertinent details available to him/her/them and hopefully make an even-handed decision based on that.
I think it is manifestly unfair of any prospective employer to assume that any woman of child-bearing age will disappear off at some stage to have a child and thus be reluctant to employ them because of that.
This would mean that the employer will have all pertinent details available to him/her/them and hopefully make an even-handed decision based on that.
I think it is manifestly unfair of any prospective employer to assume that any woman of child-bearing age will disappear off at some stage to have a child and thus be reluctant to employ them because of that.
anthro-nerd, put yourself in an employer's shoes .... if you can. You're a small business, you have only a few staff, you've spent time and money training someone, and suddenly she tells you she is taking maternity leave and you know you have to keep her job open for her until she comes back - if she does - so you can't employ someone else on a permanent basis to replace her. What are you going to do?
If you were an employer, why would you employ someone who you know is going to cost you money for several months, not only with no-return but also messing up your business by making you have to employ an expensive temp. Not only that, some of them pretend they are going to come back after the maternity period and then don't, so they've stopped you employing a stable person in the first place, as well as costing you money. All that when you could have employed someone who wasn't going to be hassle. It may be an outdated point of view but it's sound business-sense.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.