///The court heard she has 39 convictions for 62 offences, mainly for theft and violence, and was fined in May last year for racially aggravated harassment. She also has a history of mental health problems, depression and drug-related difficulties///
There is no relevance mentioning the gender identity of the assailant in the question title, it's in no way relevant to the crime, so why have you done so?
I'm not au-fait with current terminology, kval.
I was worried if I said man, as I first typed, the SJW's would attack me.
If I said woman the virtue-signallers would be up in arms.
So I used transgender like all the papers did.
Spicerack, I wasn't criticising you when I asked if this person being transgender was relevant. Just wondering why the newspaper felt it relevant enough to include it in the headline.
39 convictions and 62 offences. Yet still not jailed?
Suppose it saves having to decide which sex jail to put 'her' in. 'She' would have a terrible time in a men's or a woman's prison.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.