Technology0 min ago
So Is The Donald Correct In Seeking The Death Penaly To Deal With Drug Dealers?
22 Answers
So long as the correct Court procedure is followed I see it as a positive. After all these scum bags cause death and misery so why no dispatch them to their maker?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-55 16375/T rump-un veil-op ioid-pl an-seek ing-dea th-pena lty-dru g-deale rs-Whit e-House .html
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.“Trump cited Singapore and China for their 'zero tolerance' policy on drugs.”
LOOL, doesn’t dt know that most of the fentanyl, legal highs and precursors are made in Chinese labs/ factories?
Only opioid dealers? So cocaine and meth manufacturers who have supplied drugs that have destroyed whole communities and turned many places into police no go ghettos will be allowed to carry on?
He hasn’t thought this out has he.
LOOL, doesn’t dt know that most of the fentanyl, legal highs and precursors are made in Chinese labs/ factories?
Only opioid dealers? So cocaine and meth manufacturers who have supplied drugs that have destroyed whole communities and turned many places into police no go ghettos will be allowed to carry on?
He hasn’t thought this out has he.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
The US already has ridiculously high sentences for drug-related crimes, and it's not clear that they have had the desired effect. It's also not difficult to find judges who have been pained to pronounce such long sentences on people who are found with, say, very small amounts of drugs on them but are still receiving sentences longer than that of rapists or murderers.
Going to the ultimate sanction therefore seems like a step in the wrong direction -- or, at the very least, seems to be tackling drug problems at the wrong end of the scale.
I don't really want to suggest legalising drugs, but the idea that it should carry the death penalty is patently ridiculous, especially when as usual there's the double standard of legal (and sometimes encouraged) tobacco and alcohol "dealing".
So basically no. Hopefully Trump can address the opioid crisis but he'll need something more meaningful than this wild suggestion if he wants to do so.
Going to the ultimate sanction therefore seems like a step in the wrong direction -- or, at the very least, seems to be tackling drug problems at the wrong end of the scale.
I don't really want to suggest legalising drugs, but the idea that it should carry the death penalty is patently ridiculous, especially when as usual there's the double standard of legal (and sometimes encouraged) tobacco and alcohol "dealing".
So basically no. Hopefully Trump can address the opioid crisis but he'll need something more meaningful than this wild suggestion if he wants to do so.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
//It is (unfortunately some would say ) true that the death penalty is no deterrent //
It may not deter others but it certainly deters them from doing it again. Contrast it with the ridiculously low sentences handed out in the UK that are no deterrent whatsoever.
I agree TTT, target the rich folks and celebs nd demand should drop like a stone. But they wont. Well Maybe Donald will but no chance of the Dems doing it.
It may not deter others but it certainly deters them from doing it again. Contrast it with the ridiculously low sentences handed out in the UK that are no deterrent whatsoever.
I agree TTT, target the rich folks and celebs nd demand should drop like a stone. But they wont. Well Maybe Donald will but no chance of the Dems doing it.
I would like to think that President Trump is enough of a realist to understand that the 'War On Drugs' was always a political slogan identical to, and similarly utterly ineffectual to the 'War On Terror'.
I would like to think that, but I don't.
I think Mr Trump's election has taught him one valuable lesson - if you tell the electorate what they want to hear, they will vote for you.
Of course the tiresome issue of actually delivering what you have promised is another matter with which President Trump does not concern himself.
President Trump believes that sanctioning the death penalty for drug dealers is what people want to hear, and they will vote for him if he says it.
He is, of course, absolutely right.
This is votes in the bank for re-election time - it is not a solution to the problem of drug addiction in the United States.
I would like to think that, but I don't.
I think Mr Trump's election has taught him one valuable lesson - if you tell the electorate what they want to hear, they will vote for you.
Of course the tiresome issue of actually delivering what you have promised is another matter with which President Trump does not concern himself.
President Trump believes that sanctioning the death penalty for drug dealers is what people want to hear, and they will vote for him if he says it.
He is, of course, absolutely right.
This is votes in the bank for re-election time - it is not a solution to the problem of drug addiction in the United States.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.