Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Should This Woman Be Banned For Life From Entering The Uk?
27 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-55 44219/C anadian -far-ri ght-act ivist-c laimed- Allah-g ay-gets -lifeti me-ban- coming- UK.html
/// A Home Office Spokesperson said: 'Border Force has the power to refuse entry to an individual if it is considered that his or her presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good.' ///
They may have the power, but do they implement it so forceful for others, since we have many here who's presence is not conductive to the public's good.?
/// A Home Office Spokesperson said: 'Border Force has the power to refuse entry to an individual if it is considered that his or her presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good.' ///
They may have the power, but do they implement it so forceful for others, since we have many here who's presence is not conductive to the public's good.?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Unless there is a clear and present threat from her - no, there's no reason to ban her for life (which is a ludicrously extreme measure). I'm not entirely comfortable with the state getting to decide what is in the public interest or not (outside of truly obvious threats to safety of course) and determining immigration that way.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
There is nothing "far right" about Ms Southern as anyone who's seen any of her YouTube videos will know. She is a libertarian who is for free speech and against Islam - a perfectly consistent logical position.
If the "social experiment" in Luton was meant to demonstrate the special privileges accorded to Muslims by the British police it succeeded well.
Here's Ms. Southern distributing her "racist" material in Luton. PC Plod turns up three and a half minutes into the video accusing Southern of committing a "public order" offence, by which he meant that some Muslims were likely to become violent (to be honest a perfectly fair point) and ordering her to surrender the offensive "racist" material.
If the "social experiment" in Luton was meant to demonstrate the special privileges accorded to Muslims by the British police it succeeded well.
Here's Ms. Southern distributing her "racist" material in Luton. PC Plod turns up three and a half minutes into the video accusing Southern of committing a "public order" offence, by which he meant that some Muslims were likely to become violent (to be honest a perfectly fair point) and ordering her to surrender the offensive "racist" material.
I think that if the Border Force is going to flex its muscles in the interests of banning people who are not conducive to the public good, then, as others have suggested, it needs to indulge in a galaxy-sized sense of even-handedness, and ensure that anyone, from any country, race, or creed, who is not conducive to the public good is banned under the same legislation.
To do otherwise undermines the system, and the reputation for impartiality that it must maintain in order to function properly.
To do otherwise undermines the system, and the reputation for impartiality that it must maintain in order to function properly.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.