ChatterBank1 min ago
Now Who Would Have Thought It?
33 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-55 92357/T wo-thir ds-chil d-refug ees-lie d-age-1 8.html
Obviously most of the ordinary persons did, pity our authorities didn't take notice, but then they did everything to hide the fact, with the closed curtains on their coaches and the special barrier screens erected at the reception centres.
Obviously most of the ordinary persons did, pity our authorities didn't take notice, but then they did everything to hide the fact, with the closed curtains on their coaches and the special barrier screens erected at the reception centres.
Answers
They should be deported to the country of origin (possibly France) and permanently excluded from ever returning to the UK. What they did was put themselves above legitimate children in need. The backlash against migrants in general and Calais migrants in particular is in part because any sane and reasonable person could see these 'children' were not...
13:59 Mon 09th Apr 2018
Of the 2,952 asylum claims.......705 were involved in AGE DISPUTE!!
Of the 618 of these AGE DISPUTES that were "resolved" 402 were found to be adults. 402 is 66.4% of 618.....
Who has a way with "statistics" do you think?
The "unresolved" AGE DISPUTE cases numbering 87 could, of course, all have been children in the real world.
Of the 618 of these AGE DISPUTES that were "resolved" 402 were found to be adults. 402 is 66.4% of 618.....
Who has a way with "statistics" do you think?
The "unresolved" AGE DISPUTE cases numbering 87 could, of course, all have been children in the real world.
None of the figures is wrong (assuming the source is right), but it's pretty clear that having "two-thirds" and "3,000" in the headline is meant to suggest that there are a couple of thousand lying "children", rather than a fifth of that. It's a pretty common trick of sensationalist media. I mean, sure, the article goes on to explain the real figures, but it's still a (deliberately) misleading headline.
fiction-factory
/// And it's good that the officials found the liars out ebfore it was too late ///
That was the trouble they didn't, wasn't one who was fostered by an elderly couple recently jailed?
*** Officials insisted all the migrants were aged under 18. But some looked several years older, with crow’s feet and flecks of grey hair. ***
/// And it's good that the officials found the liars out ebfore it was too late ///
That was the trouble they didn't, wasn't one who was fostered by an elderly couple recently jailed?
*** Officials insisted all the migrants were aged under 18. But some looked several years older, with crow’s feet and flecks of grey hair. ***
>That was the trouble they didn't, wasn't one who was fostered by an elderly couple recently jailed?
That wasn't an issue about whether he was a child though was it?
I'm sure some lie and get through the checks but clearly the figure show that age is being challenged. Or are you saying the figures are amazingly high (two thirds) and yet too low (we're not catching some- the other third?) ? I'm not clear what you are saying really.
That wasn't an issue about whether he was a child though was it?
I'm sure some lie and get through the checks but clearly the figure show that age is being challenged. Or are you saying the figures are amazingly high (two thirds) and yet too low (we're not catching some- the other third?) ? I'm not clear what you are saying really.
They should be deported to the country of origin (possibly France) and permanently excluded from ever returning to the UK.
What they did was put themselves above legitimate children in need.
The backlash against migrants in general and Calais migrants in particular is in part because any sane and reasonable person could see these 'children' were not children but fully grown men.
Because of these men and the diabolical UK border system there were children left living in squalid and unacceptable conditions.
I would like to say lessons in common sense and less fear of being ladled racist or uncaring should be learnt but it isn't worth it. They will do the same because their hands are tied.
What they did was put themselves above legitimate children in need.
The backlash against migrants in general and Calais migrants in particular is in part because any sane and reasonable person could see these 'children' were not children but fully grown men.
Because of these men and the diabolical UK border system there were children left living in squalid and unacceptable conditions.
I would like to say lessons in common sense and less fear of being ladled racist or uncaring should be learnt but it isn't worth it. They will do the same because their hands are tied.