some people are looking for offense where none is implied, spend their lives looking for for it, like they need a daily grievance. my diet of the day, search out and find offensive material. hey nothing to see here
......and some waste their time posting articles on the internet from newspapers which have specifically formulated the headlines to get their target audience 'outraged'.
Jackie are you saying that Graham Waller(bless) has not complained and that SRtRC are not on the case and doing their utmost(as is their wont) to force the charity shop to prostate themselves and recant. Or are you saying that the Mail has made the story up. Do tell.
We had an Anglo-Indian lad at school whom we called Inky. Neither he nor anyone else took offence. I suppose the Bunter books are permanently out of print now. Anyone who still has a collection of them must be sitting on a small fortune.
I think it's to society's credit that it frowns on and in extreme cases criminalises racist terms like "inky" or "darky" or worse. These terms insult more recent British communities and threaten social cohesion.
On the other hand, having banned things Inky and Darky don't[i like, ought we not legalise the things they [i]do] as marrying girls under ten and clitoridectomy.
I undersrand that these things are already accepted de facto[i, but - love which dare not speak its name and all - high time these exotic cultural norms are accepted [i]de jure].