ChatterBank1 min ago
Questions For The British Home Secretary
Lots of 'first times' on here, including the first in this post to sign in on the Koran. Where is Britain heading?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
You mentioned something similar here, ich
https:/
Oopps actually that thread was largely ignored by the same posters venting their spleen on this thread. Other than Gromit, bless him.
https:/
Oopps actually that thread was largely ignored by the same posters venting their spleen on this thread. Other than Gromit, bless him.
I agree that the deep thinkers here are dragging the thread toward the inevitable end-state of "are we going to be murdered in our beds again tonight by brown skinned monsters?"
BUT
AB1 - Why is he (TR) lying then?
Why would he have some spotty upstart represent him and not his own brief? [ blimey money I would have thought]
AB2. If he did not plead guilty and did not have a trial how did he get sentenced?
AB3 ichkeria It’s a mystery Danny :-)
AB4. If you plead not guilty isn’t it worse if the case goes against you?
well none of you open mouthed wonderers have read the appeal judgement have you ?
answers there
https:/
contempt of court in a sort of special category .....
BUT
AB1 - Why is he (TR) lying then?
Why would he have some spotty upstart represent him and not his own brief? [ blimey money I would have thought]
AB2. If he did not plead guilty and did not have a trial how did he get sentenced?
AB3 ichkeria It’s a mystery Danny :-)
AB4. If you plead not guilty isn’t it worse if the case goes against you?
well none of you open mouthed wonderers have read the appeal judgement have you ?
answers there
https:/
contempt of court in a sort of special category .....
Ichkeria
It’s a mystery Danny :-)
If you plead not guilty isn’t it worse if the case goes against you?
________
You said something similar here, Ich.
https:/
Oopps actually that was me, the thread was largely ignored by the same posters venting their spleen on this thread. Other than Gromit, bless him.
It’s a mystery Danny :-)
If you plead not guilty isn’t it worse if the case goes against you?
________
You said something similar here, Ich.
https:/
Oopps actually that was me, the thread was largely ignored by the same posters venting their spleen on this thread. Other than Gromit, bless him.
//From him saying so, Krom//
Is.. that it?
//It is a strange thing to lie about, what can he possibly gain from saying it? //
Publicity. He's a convicted fraudster with a long history of posing as a victim. He earned plenty through crowdfunding campaigns designed to 'save him'. There's plenty of currency in claiming that you're being persecuted.
Let's have a think. Just how vast and extensive a conspiracy would need to exist in order for *all* the national and local media to report in public that he had pleaded guilty when in fact he hadn't? Doesn't that sound just a little bit loopy?
Is.. that it?
//It is a strange thing to lie about, what can he possibly gain from saying it? //
Publicity. He's a convicted fraudster with a long history of posing as a victim. He earned plenty through crowdfunding campaigns designed to 'save him'. There's plenty of currency in claiming that you're being persecuted.
Let's have a think. Just how vast and extensive a conspiracy would need to exist in order for *all* the national and local media to report in public that he had pleaded guilty when in fact he hadn't? Doesn't that sound just a little bit loopy?
https:/
This is what TR gets from claiming to be a victim. Dosh and eyeballs.
This is what TR gets from claiming to be a victim. Dosh and eyeballs.
And there is this
The appeal judges also found he was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty, despite it being unclear what he was admitting to, and there had been a “muddle” about the nature of the contempt he faced.
The judges said they were satisfied that the decision at Leeds to proceed to committal to prison “so promptly”, and without “due regard” to rules governing procedures surrounding someone alleged to have acted in contempt of court “gave rise to unfairness”.
The appeal judges also found he was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty, despite it being unclear what he was admitting to, and there had been a “muddle” about the nature of the contempt he faced.
The judges said they were satisfied that the decision at Leeds to proceed to committal to prison “so promptly”, and without “due regard” to rules governing procedures surrounding someone alleged to have acted in contempt of court “gave rise to unfairness”.
From ‘BoringLinksAreUs’ Just in case anyone’s interested.
https:/
Some of the comments from Robbo’s US supporters (not at the above link) in particular Roseanne Barr, are quite unbelievable, tho they show how so many Americans, as I said earlier, do not understand our laws on coverage of trials which are different to there.
https:/
Some of the comments from Robbo’s US supporters (not at the above link) in particular Roseanne Barr, are quite unbelievable, tho they show how so many Americans, as I said earlier, do not understand our laws on coverage of trials which are different to there.
Considering that Tommy Robinson was instrumental in exposing the Muslim grooming gangs, perhaps Andrew Norfolk and The Times will think about returning the favour and investigating thoroughly Tommy Robinson’s claims of mistreatment – something that, as far as I can see, no national newspaper has attempted to do. I thought my post at 10:49 Wed might have stirred up a bit of a spirit of justice and fair play, or at least a wish to see justice and fair play, but no – that spirit doesn’t appear to exist within people bent solely on character assassination.
Despite Jim’s protestations the grooming gangs are Muslim – and if you want to know why, Jim, it’s because their religion facilitates abuse of non-Muslim girls. These groups of Pakistanis, rather than doing it individually like the Sudanese rapist currently the subject of a thread in News, or the men, predominately from North Africa who attacked 1000 women in one German city on New Year’s Eve a couple of years ago, or those who are abusing women in Sweden and Holland, just had a bit of a scheme going between them. It really is that simple.
Despite Jim’s protestations the grooming gangs are Muslim – and if you want to know why, Jim, it’s because their religion facilitates abuse of non-Muslim girls. These groups of Pakistanis, rather than doing it individually like the Sudanese rapist currently the subject of a thread in News, or the men, predominately from North Africa who attacked 1000 women in one German city on New Year’s Eve a couple of years ago, or those who are abusing women in Sweden and Holland, just had a bit of a scheme going between them. It really is that simple.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank2 mins ago
Film, Media & TV5 mins ago
ChatterBank12 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles12 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
