I cannot understand why he would move so close to his crime, people have long memories about things like that, understadanbly. Loathsome though the crime was you can't have lynch mobs, that's beginning of the end.
This guy was, as has been pointed out, badly failed by the British Justice system. Sentencing is just a joke when life doesn't mean life. Taxpayers would gladly pay to keep the likes of him behind bars for life. Perhaps those making sentencing laws will reflect on the grim reality that if they don't sentence properly, others will take the law into their own hands.
Looks like the suspect in the murder of Samantha Eastwood has had a pasting too.
As for this baby killer, I have no sympathy. However, more lives have now been ruined by vigilante action and it needs to be dealt with severely. It would be a dangerous precedent to set if it weren't.
I have no problem with this man having departed this world, but in dispatching him, his killers have created a nightmare not only for themselves but for their loved ones too. Not a choice I’d make.
Some tidying up by the local taffia? Family members of the baby who have simmered and festered all these years? Local knobs out to back up their pub chat?
Doesn't really matter in the end does it? He's dead.
I thought there were rules about releasees not returning to the place of the crime to spare the r3latives of the victim.
Common sense would say don’t go back there.
The person in question served the time given for the crime, he was moved into council accommodation and moved several times so it seems he wasn't given a choice where to live.
It would appear (I read it) that his post was intercepted and thats how they discovered who he was.
Vigilantisim is not the way forward and hopefully they too will feel the full force of the law.