There, Now Can We Move On?

[douglas9401]

Seems the dodging the ambulance theory may be a bit off.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-45180120

[andy-hughes]

AOG - // andy-hughes

/// Objetively putting forward potential circumstances is not the same as excusing. ///

It is in this context. //

It's not in any context - even though you wish it were.

[sanmac]

A good lob back, spath:)

[naomi24]

Spath, //my "rubbish" is actually statistics//

We cross posted. I was talking about yet another of your silly cartoon things.

As for the rest of your rubbish, read this and learn about the Tunisian you conveniently call Lahouaiej-Bouhlel. Your post is an insult to his victims.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Lahouaiej-Bouhlel

Since you say you welcome additional information I hope that helps.

[naomi24]

spath, take a breath now and then .... and learn.

[naomi24]

spath, //Naomi you know the Nice attack had nout to do with religion, Islam or Muslims. //

For goodness sake! Read the link I gave you - and learn!

[naomi24]

spath, when you source information you aren't supposed to cherry pick.

[anotheoldgit]

spathiphyllum

/// You need to use the word 'We' because if you said 'I' you'd feel like a fool. ///

No the fools are the ones who don't admit the obvious.

[andy-hughes]

AOG - // No the fools are the ones who don't admit the obvious. //

What is 'obvious' is that some people are taking two and two and making twenty-two.

You may be proved right, but as we write, no accusations of terrorism have been brought, to as you are assuming, and there is nothing 'obvious' about that, except that you do it a lot.

[ToraToraTora]

well spath, I have to aplaud your spirited defence of TROP, Allah, I am sure will reward you as he does all his loyal devotees, Alli Akbhar!

[anotheoldgit]

andy-hughes

/// That means you (that's the 'we that AOG represents of course) are assuming on the basis of probability, which is fine, as long as you present your opinion as such. ///

And isn't that what Naomi did? When she put:

/// more often than not ///

[naomi24]

andy-hughes, //no accusations of terrorism have been brought//

headline to the link in the OP : Man arrested on suspicion of terror offences

[ToraToraTora]

"The guy was mentally ill. That is all there is to it." - well it could be argued that anyone who believes any flavour of religious cobras is on the radio rental side!

[andy-hughes]

Naomi - // In instances like this assumptions based on experience prevent one presenting oneself interminably as a useful idiot. //

I have no problem with anyone taking two and two and making twenty-two - I do think that clarifying that are making an assumption based on your own view of the situation (I wouldn't use the word 'experience' either) is more appropriate than trying to come on like some pipe-puffing beard-stroking guru on matters of terrorism,

[Peter Pedant]

about 2% Sudanis are Christian
so I think you are on a sure thing for Muslim