//...Soros...can "persuade" Mastercard and Visa not to process donations. Scary. What next? Target any business that does not support the Globalist one world order programme...and disrupt their transaction ability. If they can do this, what is stopping them keeping records of anyone who donates to the "wrong" political group...// Any business, or...
"What I'm implying in the OP, is that the so-called anti-fascist movements (Antifa) are in fact the most fascist and dangerous grouping in today's political world."
You are totally right Khandro. The reason for this is that is an extreme right party behave like them they are banned, but for some reason no action is taken against this ultra left group, yet they are just as bad, if not worse sometimes.
Why not just post the question then ‘Is Antifa as bad as the people it protests against?’ and leave out the unsubstantiated Breitbart story which doesn’t seem to be anything to do with Antifa.
‘Is George Soros also a victim (as well as a survivor) of anti Semitism?’ might be another related question tho :-)
The SPLC is a once-storied organization that did important work filing civil rights lawsuits against the Ku Klux Klan in the 1970s. But it has become a caricature of itself, labeling virtually anyone who does not fall in line with its left-wing ideology an “extremist” or “hate group.”
I wonder if Mastercard or Visa ever considered disrupting the donations it processed for ……..say Oxfam? After all were they not guilty of facilitating sexual offenders and paedophiles on a Global scale, and indeed attempting to cover up the hateful behaviour of their staff.
So the accountability for Visa and Mastercard refusing the Freedom Center as a client falls not on Visa and Mastercard but on the SPLC, does it?
No. These are big grown-up companies who can make their own choices, and do, frequently. But pointing out that it was their choice wouldn't give such a good opportunity for a rant, would it? So let's make it about SPLC instead, and then we can get on our hobby-horses ...
Ellipsis; I'm sorry you are having such a struggle to grasp the concept of the OP, allow me to explain;
It is about taking a specific example - in this case of known ultra left group of thought police (see 13:57 above) and seeing if one can extrapolate from that one individual case, to find an underlying principle, i.e. neo-fascism, - the very thing they claim to be attacking.
It's really a standard scientific method of research, not unlike say, Darwin's discovering evolution by considering tortoises!
Khandro, I fully grasp the concept of the OP, thanks. It's to create the opportunity to post lots of far-right YouTube links, isn't it? :D
What you don't seem to grasp is that the true "oppressors" are Visa and Mastercard, not those who have "allegedly convinced" them. The SPLC will do what they do, much like David Horowitz's Freedom Center, but the action that concerns you and others so much has been taken by Visa and Mastercard, not the SPLC.
"They [The extreme Left, including the SPLC] love corporations when they have control of them. They have worked hard to get fascist CEOs into positions of power. In fact, the CEO of MasterCard is a former general from India. He was an Obama appointee, but is now the CEO of an incredibly powerful American credit card monopoly. He is a Sikh, and he has no loyalty to America or American values. That is how Obama helped set up the rolling economic/political coup.
The CEO of Visa, Alfred Kelly, seems at first blush to be a typical business man until you search his interests and find out he is a board member of Concern Worldwide USA, which is run by someone who has deep ties to the UN and The Open Society Foundation and George Soros."
lol all you like, but at present there are some vey sinister things going on funded by rich people (left and right). It is not a joke and certainly not democracy.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.