ChatterBank1 min ago
Will There Be Mass Rioting, Once Britain Leaves The European Union?
83 Answers
https:/
/// GINA Miller has claimed a no-deal Brexit would "literally destroy the UK" and claimed the army is on alert to intervene to stop mass rioting once Britain leaves the European Union ///
How much of this scaremongering are we to tolerate from this woman?
/// GINA Miller has claimed a no-deal Brexit would "literally destroy the UK" and claimed the army is on alert to intervene to stop mass rioting once Britain leaves the European Union ///
How much of this scaremongering are we to tolerate from this woman?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Ah the rioting. Now I know why the scaremongers are predicting no food or drugs post Brexit. It will be our young looters waiting in the wings. :-(
How does this attention seeking nobody who is not in the cabinet,yet alone government ,know what goes on behind the closed doors of COBRA.
The MOD have denied any plans to place the military on standby thus far. This woman has had her day and achieved little. Fake News!!
How does this attention seeking nobody who is not in the cabinet,yet alone government ,know what goes on behind the closed doors of COBRA.
The MOD have denied any plans to place the military on standby thus far. This woman has had her day and achieved little. Fake News!!
"Only one answer , a second referendum..."
And what will the question be? The same as before?
"...now we know what is involved."
We've always known what would be involved. We knew we would face an EU "negotiation" that would make an amicable, pragmatic agreement all but impossible. What we didn't know was that we would be blessed with a collection of ministers and MPs whose heart was never in the job of leaving, who saw Brexit as a damage limitation exercise instead of an opportunity to go in a different direction and who could not have made a bigger cods up of the job no matter how hard they tried.
Asking the same question again won't alter that. Nor will it progress matters especially if, as most people suspect, the answer will be the same.
And what will the question be? The same as before?
"...now we know what is involved."
We've always known what would be involved. We knew we would face an EU "negotiation" that would make an amicable, pragmatic agreement all but impossible. What we didn't know was that we would be blessed with a collection of ministers and MPs whose heart was never in the job of leaving, who saw Brexit as a damage limitation exercise instead of an opportunity to go in a different direction and who could not have made a bigger cods up of the job no matter how hard they tried.
Asking the same question again won't alter that. Nor will it progress matters especially if, as most people suspect, the answer will be the same.
I'm trying to remember the source NJ and I'm afraid I can't, but yet another survey (fairly general one)commissioned by a governmental source said that 90% of people would vote the same way. This was a week or so ago. Fair to say that of the remaining 10% it would be at least a 50/50 split. No ringing endorsement of 'Remain'.
Jordain NF was saying on his show last week that more remainers had changed to leave than leavers changing to remain. Therefore at this rate leave would get more votes.
I also watched something the other day and some twit was going on about how the referendum was only (the old chestnut) advisory. But that there should be a new vote because only 33% voted. Or something like that.
Weeellll. They had an opportunity to vote. They knew what the stakes were. They knew as many details, true or false, as anyone else and decided not to vote. They had their chance and left it to the rest of us to decide and we decided.
You can’t moan about it afterwards if you didn’t bother in the first place.
I also watched something the other day and some twit was going on about how the referendum was only (the old chestnut) advisory. But that there should be a new vote because only 33% voted. Or something like that.
Weeellll. They had an opportunity to vote. They knew what the stakes were. They knew as many details, true or false, as anyone else and decided not to vote. They had their chance and left it to the rest of us to decide and we decided.
You can’t moan about it afterwards if you didn’t bother in the first place.
-- answer removed --
Scoff and probably rightly all you like about mumsnet, however ...
https:/
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.