Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Is It Not Time That The Police Along With The Help Of The Army If Necessary, Hunted Down These Gangs And Rid Them From The Streets Of London?
90 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.andy-hughes Spicerack // Where do you think black people come from? //
'Is that addressed to me?
Well, Africa of course, that's where they learn how to be gang members, and then they come and do it over here - isn't it obvious?'
It's funny you should say that.
Now I'm not claiming that Black British lads (mainly West Indian extraction) have always been paragons of virtue but I have seen them blaming recent African imports for the upsurge in violence.
Claiming they've had to 'up their game' to hold on to their pride. (and, I'm guessing, drug-dealing patches)
Whether that's true or not, I don't know but it does have a ring of truth, imo.
There certainly seems to be a upsurge in extreme violence and, I believe, an upsurge in immigrants/refugees from war-torn African countries who are probably somewhat inured against said extreme violence.
'Is that addressed to me?
Well, Africa of course, that's where they learn how to be gang members, and then they come and do it over here - isn't it obvious?'
It's funny you should say that.
Now I'm not claiming that Black British lads (mainly West Indian extraction) have always been paragons of virtue but I have seen them blaming recent African imports for the upsurge in violence.
Claiming they've had to 'up their game' to hold on to their pride. (and, I'm guessing, drug-dealing patches)
Whether that's true or not, I don't know but it does have a ring of truth, imo.
There certainly seems to be a upsurge in extreme violence and, I believe, an upsurge in immigrants/refugees from war-torn African countries who are probably somewhat inured against said extreme violence.
ANOTHEOLDGIT, for someone who often claims to smarter than me, you appear to be unable to differentiate between a street gang and a terror group.
Are you able to name a street gang that-commits or participates in acts of terrorism;
• prepares for terrorism;
• promotes or encourages terrorism (including the unlawful glorification of terrorism); or
• is otherwise concerned in terrorism?
Are you able to name a street gang that-commits or participates in acts of terrorism;
• prepares for terrorism;
• promotes or encourages terrorism (including the unlawful glorification of terrorism); or
• is otherwise concerned in terrorism?
-- answer removed --
THECORBYLOON
/// Are you able to name a street gang that-commits or participates in acts of terrorism;
• prepares for terrorism;
• promotes or encourages terrorism (including the unlawful glorification of terrorism); or
• is otherwise concerned in terrorism? ///
ALL OF THEM!!!!
Don't you think that these gangs are 'terrorising' their communities?
How many killings has that banned far-right gang committed?
/// Are you able to name a street gang that-commits or participates in acts of terrorism;
• prepares for terrorism;
• promotes or encourages terrorism (including the unlawful glorification of terrorism); or
• is otherwise concerned in terrorism? ///
ALL OF THEM!!!!
Don't you think that these gangs are 'terrorising' their communities?
How many killings has that banned far-right gang committed?
ummmm
/// And you have the nerve to complain about other people being rude!! ///
As I have said before I am not rude to anyone who isn't first rude to me, I answer only in the language that they have been brought up to understand.
So before criticising me, for being rude, first take a look at your buddies responses.
/// And you have the nerve to complain about other people being rude!! ///
As I have said before I am not rude to anyone who isn't first rude to me, I answer only in the language that they have been brought up to understand.
So before criticising me, for being rude, first take a look at your buddies responses.
As you are clearly confused about the legal definition of terrorism, this is it.
"What is meant by ‘terrorism’ in the proscription context?
A. “Terrorism” as defined in the Act, means the use or threat which: involves serious violence
against a person; involves serious damage to property; endangers a person’s life (other than that of the person committing the act); creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or section of the public; or is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system. The use or threat of such action must be designed to influence the government or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public or a section of the public and be undertaken for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause."
"What is meant by ‘terrorism’ in the proscription context?
A. “Terrorism” as defined in the Act, means the use or threat which: involves serious violence
against a person; involves serious damage to property; endangers a person’s life (other than that of the person committing the act); creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or section of the public; or is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system. The use or threat of such action must be designed to influence the government or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public or a section of the public and be undertaken for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause."
THECORBYLOON
/// “Terrorism” as defined in the Act, means the use or threat which: involves serious violence
against a person; involves serious damage to property; endangers a person’s life ///
Well I think that we can all say that just about covers the London gangs actions.
Why some of you are against any criticism levelled against these savage murderous gangs, I can but guess.
/// “Terrorism” as defined in the Act, means the use or threat which: involves serious violence
against a person; involves serious damage to property; endangers a person’s life ///
Well I think that we can all say that just about covers the London gangs actions.
Why some of you are against any criticism levelled against these savage murderous gangs, I can but guess.
You missed out the section that says, "The use or threat of such action must be designed to influence the government or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public or a section of the public and be undertaken for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause."
Can you give an instance where a street gang satisfies that requirement?
Can you give an instance where a street gang satisfies that requirement?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.