T W A U ... The Chase....from...
Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Banned From Teaching.......??
61 Answers
https:/
Why isn't he in jail?
Why isn't he in jail?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
TTT - // maggie said: "Have the panel actually seen any 13 year old girls recently? Many (including my own granddaughter) could easily be taken for 18." - does look to me a like she is saying it's an easy mistake to make, implying it is somehow understandable. //
A little selective editing there I think - Maggie also said that she found his behaviour abhorrent, but you seem to have missed that bit in your cut-and-paste.
A little selective editing there I think - Maggie also said that she found his behaviour abhorrent, but you seem to have missed that bit in your cut-and-paste.
Spicerack - // Mysterious, alright. I never noticed the libtards excuse white footballers who molested underage girls on the grounds 'they might have looked older' //
Are we reading the same thread?
Please point out to me the post, or posts where someone says that they excuse this man for his behaviour.
Are we reading the same thread?
Please point out to me the post, or posts where someone says that they excuse this man for his behaviour.
Spicerack - // Don't let the AB bully mob grind you down, ttt. All decent ABers agree with you. //
Point 1, there is no 'AB bully mob'.
And point 2, what can any AB'ers 'agree with', be they decent or otherwise? All TTT has done is falsely accuse anyone and everyone of backing this monster, and defending his behaviour, which no-one has even hinted at.
Point 1, there is no 'AB bully mob'.
And point 2, what can any AB'ers 'agree with', be they decent or otherwise? All TTT has done is falsely accuse anyone and everyone of backing this monster, and defending his behaviour, which no-one has even hinted at.
TTT - // cheers spice, it is odd how they can apply different interpretations to English dependent on the subject matter. When in the past English Footballers used the excuse that underage girls looked 18 they were rightly condemned. It seems the same does not apply to Muslim Teachers. //
I think you are just being mischievous now
No-one defended English footballers then, no-one is defending Bangladeshi teachers now.
Try reading what people have said, not what you would like them to ahve said so you can work yourself up into a self-righteous lather and post nonsense.
I think you are just being mischievous now
No-one defended English footballers then, no-one is defending Bangladeshi teachers now.
Try reading what people have said, not what you would like them to ahve said so you can work yourself up into a self-righteous lather and post nonsense.
Talbot - // But saying 'She looked at least eighteen' is standard defense by men in cases of having underage sex, andy.
Maggie used that standard defense. //
Maggie ended her post by saying that his behaviour was abhorrent, - that seems a strange way to 'defend' anything - wouldn't you agree?
Or have you caught TTT's infection, which makes you see what you want to see so you can get het up about it?
Maggie used that standard defense. //
Maggie ended her post by saying that his behaviour was abhorrent, - that seems a strange way to 'defend' anything - wouldn't you agree?
Or have you caught TTT's infection, which makes you see what you want to see so you can get het up about it?
Yes she did say he was abhorrent but she also said
Have the panel actually seen any 13 year old girls recently? Many (including my own granddaughter) could easily be taken for 18.
What was Maggies point in saying thhe above?
No excuses as far as I am concerned, the above is a standard defence used by men in cases of underage sex.
Have the panel actually seen any 13 year old girls recently? Many (including my own granddaughter) could easily be taken for 18.
What was Maggies point in saying thhe above?
No excuses as far as I am concerned, the above is a standard defence used by men in cases of underage sex.
AH: “A little selective editing there I think - Maggie also said that she found his behaviour abhorrent, but you seem to have missed that bit in your cut-and-paste.” – yes but we were discussing whether that is an excuse and you said it was “absolutely not an excuse” . From the wording I’m saying it looks like it is intended to be one. I acknowledge the condemnation but I was trying to address your “absolutely not and excuse” point.
TCL: “Have you evidence he's a Muslim?” – he’s a Bangladeshi, 90% of them are muslims, I’ll take those odds.
AH: 17:00 “I think you are just being mischievous now No-one defended English footballers then, no-one is defending Bangladeshi teachers now.” – quite right no one defended them and no ones used that as an excuse, it seems though it’s ok for Muslim teachers to use it thus”.
AH: “Try reading what people have said, not what you would like them to ahve said so you can work yourself up into a self-righteous lather and post nonsense.” – You too, you even quote me above then make a statement based on what is not in the quote.
TCL: “Have you evidence he's a Muslim?” – he’s a Bangladeshi, 90% of them are muslims, I’ll take those odds.
AH: 17:00 “I think you are just being mischievous now No-one defended English footballers then, no-one is defending Bangladeshi teachers now.” – quite right no one defended them and no ones used that as an excuse, it seems though it’s ok for Muslim teachers to use it thus”.
AH: “Try reading what people have said, not what you would like them to ahve said so you can work yourself up into a self-righteous lather and post nonsense.” – You too, you even quote me above then make a statement based on what is not in the quote.
Talbot - // What was Maggies point in saying thhe above?
No excuses as far as I am concerned, the above is a standard defence used by men in cases of underage sex. //
I have explained what I see as Maggies point, if you disagree with what she says, i suggest you take it up with her, it's her post you have an issue with.
No excuses as far as I am concerned, the above is a standard defence used by men in cases of underage sex. //
I have explained what I see as Maggies point, if you disagree with what she says, i suggest you take it up with her, it's her post you have an issue with.
TTT - // AH: “Try reading what people have said, not what you would like them to ahve said so you can work yourself up into a self-righteous lather and post nonsense.” – You too, you even quote me above then make a statement based on what is not in the quote. //
As I advised Talbot, if you disagree with what Maggie said, take it up with her.
In the meantime, where are all those posts from this thread that defend this monster? You can see them - can't you?
As I advised Talbot, if you disagree with what Maggie said, take it up with her.
In the meantime, where are all those posts from this thread that defend this monster? You can see them - can't you?
