ChatterBank0 min ago
Surely Local Authorities Can Dispose Of Bodies Cheaper Than This...
65 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-engla nd-4679 6036
Not withstanding the newer firms doing cheap "funerals" for just over a grand, surely the local authorities own the crematoria anyway, I don;t see why this is such an expense. Once body cleared for disposal, in the oven, sorted. Anyone with more direct knowledge shed any light?
Not withstanding the newer firms doing cheap "funerals" for just over a grand, surely the local authorities own the crematoria anyway, I don;t see why this is such an expense. Once body cleared for disposal, in the oven, sorted. Anyone with more direct knowledge shed any light?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Birmingham spent the most by far, saying //"As the largest local authority in the UK, Birmingham's spend on public health funerals will inevitably be higher when compared to other cities, reflecting the population it serves."// but that doesn’t make sense. On average it spent vastly more per funeral than other areas. Why should a pauper’s funeral cost so much more in one area than in any other?
2,507 per funeral (990437 / 395) guessing that cost will also include removal of the body, any "special services" depending on the state of said body and storage until the disposal. I think that the simple funerals advertised only cover the actual funeral with no storage or special services so doesn't sound too outrageous to me.
On average it spent vastly more per funeral than other areas
That's not what it says. It doesn't say "on average". Birmingham has the third highest rate of pauper funerals, and it looks as if it's the biggest area, since London is broken down by borough. So you'd expect the total to be higher than anyone else, and it is.
That's not what it says. It doesn't say "on average". Birmingham has the third highest rate of pauper funerals, and it looks as if it's the biggest area, since London is broken down by borough. So you'd expect the total to be higher than anyone else, and it is.
I entirely agree with your sentiments that the lowest cost option for basic funerals, i.e. the simple disposal of a body, is overpriced. For the uplift of waste from the kerbside at our house I need only pay the council £15 for a quantity far exceeding the volume and weight of a non-obese (see recent thread for discussion on obesity, if interested) human body. Granted that there is perhaps a bit more sensitivity involved than simply putting to landfill, but an average of above £1000 still seems high, even allowing for inherent inefficiency in everything government run.
Apart from someone being present to perform a short ceremony of committal at the graveside as a token of respect for the deceased, that appears to be basically what happens, TTT. There is no funeral service.
https:/ /www.fu neralzo ne.co.u k/help- resourc es/arra nging-a -funera l/what- is-a-pa upers-f uneral- public- health- funeral s-expla ined
https:/
just had another thought......councils charge for the use of their crematoria....so I guess that a part of the cost to the council is in lost revenue....which is reasonable and generally how businesses calculate the cost of things. The army do the same when they say that such and such an operation costs them xxx amount. they take into account the salaries and costs of the staff involved, even though they would not really have that money or have saved it if they hadn't undertaken the operation.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.