Crosswords7 mins ago
Tommy Robinson To Stand As An Independent At The Forecoming European Elections
Good news regarding tommy Robinson decision to stand in the north west,just hope other parties don't stand as to split the vote and he can give the traitors of the cons/ lab and libdums a good hammering!! Is to late to move to the north west!!
Answers
Tommy's a very popular person, whether some of you like it or not. I think he'll do well and certainly won't lose any deposit unless the fix is in.
14:24 Fri 26th Apr 2019
Theresa may knowingly armed Saudi Arabia. They have some sketchy relationship. The sausis then used these weapons to blow up a sYemin school bus full of children.
Having empathy and sympathy for a terrorist, isn't as bad as arming one.
When people use "terrorist sympathiser" to defame Corbyn and to promote the status quo, it's giving a false impression of the two parties. So it is slander.
Having empathy and sympathy for a terrorist, isn't as bad as arming one.
When people use "terrorist sympathiser" to defame Corbyn and to promote the status quo, it's giving a false impression of the two parties. So it is slander.
SparklyKid - // He speaks for the majority. Only a fool would not recognise his popularity. A well educated great speaker. //
I have to take issue with a couple of points there -
I don't believe 'Tommy Robinson' speaks for the majority, I also dispute that he is actually that popular, in real terms, let's not confuse a high media profile with popularity, the two are not necessarily synonymous. For example, millions of people know who Rolf Harris is, that doesn't make him a welcome addition to any dinner party.
I would also argue that 'Tommy' is 'well educated', or a 'great speaker'. I think he is well educated in the specific areas in which he makes his living - which is racially based agitation and incitement, and similarly, I think he speaks well about them, but that does not make him well educated or a great speaker outside those narrow parameters.
And that brings me to my actual response to the OP -
I believe that 'Tommy Robinson' comes from the same background, and has similar skills, to Jeremy Corbyn. Neither are politicians, both are professional agitators, which makes them vocal as opposition to government, but it means that they have less than no clue about how the political system, and indeed democracy and the legislative process works.
This would mean that either of them would be floundering and seriously out of their mutual depth, were they required to actually make workable decisions, as opposed to simply standing on the side-lines shouting loudly about how badly everyone else is doing things. That's easy - government and actual responsibility are not, and neither of them is fit for either.
I have to take issue with a couple of points there -
I don't believe 'Tommy Robinson' speaks for the majority, I also dispute that he is actually that popular, in real terms, let's not confuse a high media profile with popularity, the two are not necessarily synonymous. For example, millions of people know who Rolf Harris is, that doesn't make him a welcome addition to any dinner party.
I would also argue that 'Tommy' is 'well educated', or a 'great speaker'. I think he is well educated in the specific areas in which he makes his living - which is racially based agitation and incitement, and similarly, I think he speaks well about them, but that does not make him well educated or a great speaker outside those narrow parameters.
And that brings me to my actual response to the OP -
I believe that 'Tommy Robinson' comes from the same background, and has similar skills, to Jeremy Corbyn. Neither are politicians, both are professional agitators, which makes them vocal as opposition to government, but it means that they have less than no clue about how the political system, and indeed democracy and the legislative process works.
This would mean that either of them would be floundering and seriously out of their mutual depth, were they required to actually make workable decisions, as opposed to simply standing on the side-lines shouting loudly about how badly everyone else is doing things. That's easy - government and actual responsibility are not, and neither of them is fit for either.
spath - // at least corbyns not a certified criminals. //
That's true, but it's no basis for an argument in support of anyone.
Most of us are not lots of 'anythings' - thieves, murderers, thugs, tax avoiders, arsonists …. the list goes on - but that doesn't make us suitable for something because we can measure that against someone who is any of those things, it's an unsustainable argument.
That's true, but it's no basis for an argument in support of anyone.
Most of us are not lots of 'anythings' - thieves, murderers, thugs, tax avoiders, arsonists …. the list goes on - but that doesn't make us suitable for something because we can measure that against someone who is any of those things, it's an unsustainable argument.
The actual words he said at Wythenshawe (my own place of birth btw)
were;
“If you elect me to the European Parliament, I’ll represent you, the working class of England.
Whether it’s enforcing our borders and cutting back on immigration, or taking back our national sovereignty to make British decisions in Britain, or fighting to preserve our national identity against Islamification, I’m on the side of the people.”
Is anything wrong with that?
were;
“If you elect me to the European Parliament, I’ll represent you, the working class of England.
Whether it’s enforcing our borders and cutting back on immigration, or taking back our national sovereignty to make British decisions in Britain, or fighting to preserve our national identity against Islamification, I’m on the side of the people.”
Is anything wrong with that?
Latest Posts
Crosswords7 mins ago
ChatterBank20 mins ago
Shopping & Style20 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles25 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.