Body & Soul3 mins ago
Time To Reign In Social Media?
40 Answers
Today it seems too easy to trash someones life over nothing and in some cases it is just that lies and rumour, now we have potentially malicious rumours that could cause a run on a Bank. We have also seen people die becasue of social media content.
Is it time to make the Social media companies responsible, not just for removing content but providing proof of who posted it?
Then those responsible should be prosecuted.
It has to get to that point as some time as people are just not responsible but when will enough be enough?
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-7 020755/ Metro-B ank-tel ls-cust omers-m oney-sa fe-desp ite-soc ial-med ia-rumo urs.htm l
Is it time to make the Social media companies responsible, not just for removing content but providing proof of who posted it?
Then those responsible should be prosecuted.
It has to get to that point as some time as people are just not responsible but when will enough be enough?
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.sure it's in the public domain, dannyk, anyone can access it, anyone can join. Any laws cracking down on Facebook would normally have to crack down on AB as well. If they exempted AB on the grounds that it doesn't have as many members, FB would claim this was a punishment for popularity.
I can't see any logical way of doing this, though ymb may suggest some.
I can't see any logical way of doing this, though ymb may suggest some.
"jno beat me to it - as AB is social media do you suggest that we prosecute those that cause trouble on here with their name calling?"
No, you have taken it to the extreme, but if someone posts malicious rumours or accusations why shouldn't they be held responsible just as they would be for any other media? I'm not talking name calling here BTW and it is a question.
jno, no, I dont have an answer as I am in two minds over control hence the question.
No, you have taken it to the extreme, but if someone posts malicious rumours or accusations why shouldn't they be held responsible just as they would be for any other media? I'm not talking name calling here BTW and it is a question.
jno, no, I dont have an answer as I am in two minds over control hence the question.
" Although the objective is to pass around the message without it becoming garbled along the way, part of the enjoyment is that, regardless, this usually ends up happening... It is often invoked as a metaphor for cumulative error, especially the inaccuracies as rumours or gossip spread... It shows how easily information can become corrupted by indirect communication. The game has been used in schools to simulate the spread of gossip and its supposed harmful effects." This is both somewhat descriptive of the game "Chinese Whispers" and social media isn't it? How to 'control' it I have no idea.
I have no problem posting on AB under my own name. I am aware that there is name calling and issues when some are challenged. We seem to have sensible moderators and Ed and spare Ed who step in where necessary. We can also report if we have concerns about a post or comments. Maybe the other sites need to follow ab example
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.