Question Author
AOG - // andy-hughes
Who else is there to defend him and also to stand by him, if not his wife?
Can't blame her for being in such an advantageous position, so as to do so.
Wouldn't any devoted wife use any possible legal measure available to them , so as to stand by their man? //
Indeed - but that does not make this acceptable.
Either the Mail said to Sarah Vine - Why don't you trot out two pages of wheedling apologising guff to give your hypocrite of a husband a leg-up in his doomed attempt to be PM, in which case Ms Vine adopts the simple morality common to mature adults, and advises her employers that such an action would be an inappropriate abuse of her position as a journalist, and the paper's position as a newspaper and not a political propaganda machine …
or …
Sarah Vine says to the Mail - Why don't I trot out two pages of wheedling apologising guff to give my hypocrite of a husband a leg-up in his doomed attempt to be PM, in which case the Mail adopts the simple morality common to newspaper editors, and advises her that such an action would be an inappropriate abuse of her position as a journalist, and the paper's position as a newspaper and not a political propaganda machine …
Whichever way round this was created, it leaves both parties with their integrity and dignity damaged.
I am all in favour of spouses defending their other halves - but there are means that are appropriate with which to do so, and ways that are inappropriate - it's obvious which this is.