Of course it's fair- she wasn't entitled to housing benefit. I have some reservations about means testing but if the rules are in place and others are expected to follow them, so should she.
I don't think so Ummmm, it's not very clear.
She has to pay it back Wolf.
Silly woman, instead of saving her money, she should have bought herself a massive TV, the latest phone, smoked and drank and gone on holiday then she wouldn't be in trouble. She has been retired 30 years so that's a long time to save £16k.
She’d saved £32000 - if a non-elderly person claiming benefits was in the same position you can bet that there would be some people saying that benefits are too generous.
>Silly woman, instead of saving her money, she should have bought herself a massive TV, the latest phone, smoked and drank and gone on holiday then she wouldn't be in trouble.
But she was saving money she wasn't entitled to. Why should many other pensioners and taxpayers pay her housing benefit
FF it seems to me she was entitled to her benefits when she first claimed but has since saved too much instead of spending it. Should have paid for her funeral with some of it as she wanted to save her family the expense when she died.
It does seem that some people are receiving too much in benefits, if this is even possible. It isn't just this lady that should pay it back, but anyone in a similar position.
Of course she will have had her free TV Licence Ryzen, she was entitled to it.
Pixie, I know, it just seems harsh for someone who left school illiterate, and has learning difficulties. As someone has previously mentioned, aren't savings checked every year for people on benefits?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.