https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/boris-johnson-vows-no-deal-brexit-by-any-means-necessary-55tjljkfw
Boris Johnson has set up a “war cabinet” to deliver Brexit “by any means necessary” by October 31 as a senior cabinet minister warned that there was “now a very real prospect” of no deal.
Nice turn around, up to now the HOQ as tried to thwart democracy by any means necessary. Will the EUSSR now accept we are prepared to leave with no deal? Will they let that happen?
The name calling and insults don't count 3T when they emanate from the "correct" source. The insults and name calling that started within hours of the Referendum result, and in some cases, during the preliminary "exchange of views". Remember some think freedom of speech is only an acceptable concept when they are doing the talking. The days are long gone...
When, and only when, you withdraw your disgusting bile about looking forward to "quislings jumping into the channel", you have a right to complain about insults. Until then, if you dish it out, TTT, then you may as well take it too.
It's hit no such nerve. I'm just sick of the tone that debate has reached, and not just on this site. Gulliver's posts are unnecessarily rude, but to refer to people as traitors is a whole different class of insult and worthy of every condemnation it gets.
13.22 ,"Gullivers posts are unnecessarily Rude". Jim I am only rude to those who are rude to me, OK !. Also may I remind you that you ain't to bad at it yourself
//I'm just sick of the tone that debate has reached, and not just on this site.//
Ahh diddums bet you are with Paloma Faith though(or Pullin Her Face as I call her) who says this in yet another bizarre leftie temper tantrum.
“I want a dyke for Prime Minister.
I want a person with AIDS for Prime Minister.
I want a Prime Minister that had an abortion at sixteen,
I want a Prime Minister who has stood in line at the Job Centre and has been unemployed and laid off and sexually harassed and gaybashed and deported,
I want a black woman for Prime Minister.
I want someone who crossdresses and has done drugs and has been in therapy.
I want someone who has committed civil disobedience.” sic.
anyway jim, I have many times asked for a better label for those that collaborate with a foreign power to undermine their own nation. None has been forthcoming from you or anyone else.
The name calling and insults don't count 3T when they emanate from the "correct" source. The insults and name calling that started within hours of the Referendum result, and in some cases, during the preliminary "exchange of views". Remember some think freedom of speech is only an acceptable concept when they are doing the talking. The days are long gone when we who listened aghast at some of the nonsense incubated in scatter brains just used to tap our temples and wind our fingers at the side of our heads, thinking that they would soon realise what garbage they were promoting. No chance, they just got louder and even more brazen. Now we have decided to answer back and fight fire with fire, they have decided it is not fair anymore.
I used to associate the use of traitor, collaborator, Quisling etc with the more rabble-rousing on the debating front. You know, those who might know whereto go for a good night out with other DM wearing skinheads, pogo-ing and shouting OI! to hate filled songs while tossing Nazi salutes about the place.
I wonder if those behaviours have been co-opted or if it's just that nobody cares about being out there these days.
The green and pleasant hopes seem like a smokescreen for a power grab.
Thinking that the UK's best future is to remain in the EU after all are not collaborating. Nor are they traitors, quislings, or any other of the Nazi-related insults you come out with. There are no two ways about this.
sad thing for Paloma Faith, or anyone else of the mindset that wants a prime minister as described, is that they'd usually end up with an uneducated oik who then proceeds to mouth off in a very off-colour (or even illegal) way and gets themselves suspended.
Freedom of speech means that the government has no right to arrest you merely for what you say. It doesn't protect you from rules that apply on internet forums, and it doesn't mean that anyone has to listen to you either.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.