//Why are Remainers all about what benefits them personally? Maybe that's why they don't understand Brexit.//
This Leave voter expected that he would be personally poorer if the vote went they way he hoped. Mainly because I thought the two (ha ha!) years it would take to leave would create uncertaintly in the markets and the stock market would fall, reducing my notional wealth (such as it is) and my potential income.
I'm also in the demographic which Mr Christian wants to see killed off and twenty year old narcissists at university think wants "selfishly" to destroy their future.
Most people are not selfish in the way suggested: they want to pass on something to their children, and, moreover, want their children to have better lives than they had, not worse ones.
The main benefit of Brexit is to reclaim our rights as a sovereign nation. The EU is not just a federal project, it's about the destruction of national independence and replacing democratic government with bureaucratic control, ie. the European Commission which is unelected and self-perpetuating. Witness the latest appointments.
To repeat (as is my boring right given my age demographic) a former, if imperfect comparison, with ancient Rome: the Roman Republic with its Senate, popular assemblies and tribunes of the people was succeeded by an emperor who governed his empire with the aid of his secretariat with recourse and accountability to no-one. Former symbols of republican rule such as the Senate became rubber stamps.
Avoiding that, ladies and gentlemen, was why this poster voted to leave. And not for my personal benefit, because I won't be around long enough to suffer the EU's future encroachments on national sovereignty and individual freedom, nor, possibly, the economic benefits of quitting.