ChatterBank2 mins ago
Is Labour Intending To Restore Clause 4 Etc?
6 Answers
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/l abour-r ubbishe s-claim s-it-wa nts-to- restore -1917-v ersion- of-part y-const itution -clause -four-1 1813800
On the basis that you should never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied are Labour going to revert to their pre St Tony selves?
On the basis that you should never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied are Labour going to revert to their pre St Tony selves?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.////Sadiq Khan said the party should go forwards - not backwards////
I wish they would make up their minds.
Christmas is just round the corner and the Goons advocated walking backwards.
https:/ /uk.vid eo.sear ch.yaho o.com/s earch/v ideo?fr =yfp-t- s&p =i%27m+ walking +backwa rds+for +christ mas+by+ spike+m illigan #id=1&a mp;vid= 84aab37 f1a74de ee8df85 0502944 15de&am p;actio n=click
I wish they would make up their minds.
Christmas is just round the corner and the Goons advocated walking backwards.
https:/
Labour’s current constitution commits Labour to...
// a dynamic economy, serving the public interest, in which the enterprise of the market and the rigour of competition are joined with the forces of partnership and co-operation to produce the wealth the nation needs //
What a load of tripe that is. It does indeed re-writing. Not with Clause 4, but with something more honest and less waffly.
// a dynamic economy, serving the public interest, in which the enterprise of the market and the rigour of competition are joined with the forces of partnership and co-operation to produce the wealth the nation needs //
What a load of tripe that is. It does indeed re-writing. Not with Clause 4, but with something more honest and less waffly.
With Labour's present hierarchy I would imagine they would go for the original Clause 4:-
//The clause was originally drawn up in 1917 to commit Labour to "secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry" on the basis of "common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange".//
//The clause was originally drawn up in 1917 to commit Labour to "secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry" on the basis of "common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange".//
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.