News1 min ago
Barry Sheerman Explosion
watching the commons debate, then mr sheerman blew up verbally, wow..i thought his neck was going to explode, anyone else think he was somewhat over the top.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-7 504079/ Labours -Barry- Sheerma n-attac ks-Atto rney-Ge neral-C ommons. html
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I listened to most of todays commons debate on the car radio.
I just watched highlights on ITV News at Ten.
It sounds like a ranch or zoo on the radio with all the representatives of the people mooing and baaing in the background when you can hardly hear the person on their feet.A shameful exhibition of playground politics. Bercow,as usual, says little when his opponents are on their feet and allows the embarassing fiasco to continue.
I just watched highlights on ITV News at Ten.
It sounds like a ranch or zoo on the radio with all the representatives of the people mooing and baaing in the background when you can hardly hear the person on their feet.A shameful exhibition of playground politics. Bercow,as usual, says little when his opponents are on their feet and allows the embarassing fiasco to continue.
You’re a bit late with this...
Mr Sheerman’s reaction came after a much posher sounding but equalling forceful rant from the Attorney General.
What is very frustrating when you listen to these statements is that a minister can take a question and simply ignore it. And it seems there is no comeback possible from the questioner.
Gove was asked the same question about 8 times and every time he ignored it. Although I would have thought by the end it would have been obvious that the most effective approach would have been to cut all preamble, thus giving the minister no other “stuff” to address and hide behind.
Mr Sheerman’s reaction came after a much posher sounding but equalling forceful rant from the Attorney General.
What is very frustrating when you listen to these statements is that a minister can take a question and simply ignore it. And it seems there is no comeback possible from the questioner.
Gove was asked the same question about 8 times and every time he ignored it. Although I would have thought by the end it would have been obvious that the most effective approach would have been to cut all preamble, thus giving the minister no other “stuff” to address and hide behind.
I agree ken.
I thought the AG’s rant was appalling, but for its content only.
His oratory was impressive.
And so was the passion of the speakers.
My view is that the PK is deliberately stirring it to divert attention from his own dismal shortcomings sharp practice in public office and indeed Barry Gardiner made this point later.
It’s gratifying to see that his personal ratings have dipped significantly since Tuesday.
I thought the AG’s rant was appalling, but for its content only.
His oratory was impressive.
And so was the passion of the speakers.
My view is that the PK is deliberately stirring it to divert attention from his own dismal shortcomings sharp practice in public office and indeed Barry Gardiner made this point later.
It’s gratifying to see that his personal ratings have dipped significantly since Tuesday.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.