Crosswords0 min ago
Anti Abortion Banner
women want autonomy over there bodies, so be it...this is getting like the mad vegans, invading restaurants with placards shouting abuse. what happened to live and let live.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-7 520325/ Stella- Creasy- MP-call s-Home- Secreta ry-Prit i-Patel -stop-h arassme nt-wome n-Walth amstow. html
https:/
Answers
cassa - // Does a half born child, with its head still in the birth canal and it’s body outside wriggling and kicking deserve to decapitated and killed? // The use of emotive images and languages does not aid the veracity of your point. And again here - // If you chose to murder your unborn child for what can often be no other reason than ‘I’m too stupid to...
15:52 Mon 30th Sep 2019
APG - // Women seeking abortions for any other reason than serious medical or mental reasons should be made to watch film of an abortion taking place and the resulting 'mess'. Abortion should be illegal after 12 weeks, this would be entirely long enough to realise you were pregnant and did not want to be. //
Once again you are offering to make moral decisions that are actually not yours to make.
There is no-one in society qualified to say that a woman has 'failed the test' and should therefore be punished by seeing graphic images, or be denied a termination because again, some arbitrary time-limit has been placed on her choice.
There will always be people who, when choice is offered, will make bad choices through ignorance, stupidity, wanton idiocy, and so on - but to deny anyone a choice on the basis of such rules as you suggest is not the way a civilised society behaves.
Yes, it would be great if every pregnancy was wanted, and a successful child rearing was assured, but that is not the way the world turns, and we have to deal with what is, not we would wish for.
Once again you are offering to make moral decisions that are actually not yours to make.
There is no-one in society qualified to say that a woman has 'failed the test' and should therefore be punished by seeing graphic images, or be denied a termination because again, some arbitrary time-limit has been placed on her choice.
There will always be people who, when choice is offered, will make bad choices through ignorance, stupidity, wanton idiocy, and so on - but to deny anyone a choice on the basis of such rules as you suggest is not the way a civilised society behaves.
Yes, it would be great if every pregnancy was wanted, and a successful child rearing was assured, but that is not the way the world turns, and we have to deal with what is, not we would wish for.
Spicerack - // //Once again you are offering to make moral decisions that are actually not yours to make//
They are decisions that society makes. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. //
Of course they are - the problem arises when someone becomes powerful enough for their opinion to become the way things are.
They are decisions that society makes. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. //
Of course they are - the problem arises when someone becomes powerful enough for their opinion to become the way things are.
A viable baby, is, of course, spice. The problem always seems to be with these kinds of conversations, that they veer wildly from one extreme to the other- so both sound totally unreasonable.
In reality, the majority won't be at either extreme, but somewhere in the middle... and the question is really, where should a line be drawn... and "if". My views are, that there are obvious limits, but if in doubt, it obviously has to be up to the woman. I can't see any reason why somebody else should be allowed to overrule her.
Out of these states... are you saying that a woman can give birth to a full-term, healthy baby and then decide to have him/her euthanised the day after? Is that literally it? And how many mothers have chosen it... and why?
In reality, the majority won't be at either extreme, but somewhere in the middle... and the question is really, where should a line be drawn... and "if". My views are, that there are obvious limits, but if in doubt, it obviously has to be up to the woman. I can't see any reason why somebody else should be allowed to overrule her.
Out of these states... are you saying that a woman can give birth to a full-term, healthy baby and then decide to have him/her euthanised the day after? Is that literally it? And how many mothers have chosen it... and why?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.