Crosswords4 mins ago
Nhs & The 7%
As it seems 7% of the NHS is now in private hands - what would that be exactly- would it be MIR scans for instance?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ric.ror. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.MIR scans (as far as i'm aware) are provided via the NHS if necessary.
Instances of privatisation would be things such as Eye Tests, Physiotherapy, Podiatry and certain Tests and Scans.
Further privatisation of the NHS could see things like, more chiropractic privatisation (not all Chiropractic issues are available on NHS but many still are) or private trauma units for those with broken arms. They would have Xrays, the ability to cast and then assess the healing process but you pay need to pay £100 for the xray, cast and continued observation. This is just one example of the kind of process you'd go through if the NHS was privatised further. The example I have given would apply if the NHS stopped treating broken arms and legs.
Instances of privatisation would be things such as Eye Tests, Physiotherapy, Podiatry and certain Tests and Scans.
Further privatisation of the NHS could see things like, more chiropractic privatisation (not all Chiropractic issues are available on NHS but many still are) or private trauma units for those with broken arms. They would have Xrays, the ability to cast and then assess the healing process but you pay need to pay £100 for the xray, cast and continued observation. This is just one example of the kind of process you'd go through if the NHS was privatised further. The example I have given would apply if the NHS stopped treating broken arms and legs.
//They would have Xrays, the ability to cast and then assess the healing process but you pay need to pay £100 for the xray, cast and continued observation.//
no you wouldn't. the service would still be free at point of use, but provided by an outsourced contractor, with the contractor being paid by the NHS.
no you wouldn't. the service would still be free at point of use, but provided by an outsourced contractor, with the contractor being paid by the NHS.
I was referred to this company in the summer following a fracture for a DEXA imaging scan.
https:/ /www.nh s.uk/Se rvices/ Trusts/ Overvie w/Defau ltView. aspx?id =90519
They have been affiliated with the NHS for a long time.
https:/
They have been affiliated with the NHS for a long time.
"no you wouldn't. the service would still be free at point of use, but provided by an outsourced contractor, with the contractor being paid by the NHS."
That actually surprises me.
So the consumer will always get free healthcare, and the NHS will foot the bill?
How is that different to the NHS just carrying out the work with no bill to pay? Surely they'd think we can do it cheaper?
That actually surprises me.
So the consumer will always get free healthcare, and the NHS will foot the bill?
How is that different to the NHS just carrying out the work with no bill to pay? Surely they'd think we can do it cheaper?
//So the consumer will always get free healthcare, and the NHS will foot the bill?
How is that different to the NHS just carrying out the work with no bill to pay? Surely they'd think we can do it cheaper? //
I'm not sure you could say "always" but certainly for now, almost certainly in your lifetime and probably in your child's lifetime. there may be a political aspiration to make the NHS a commercial supplier but at this time, the insurance scheme that would be required to ensure users could afford the service just isn't there, and it would be political suicide for any party to attempt to do that in any time frame that wasn't long-term.
and the organisation needs to do what it does best, and if someone else can do it better, then you let them. given the size of the NHS the overheads are huge, and peripheral services can't always be done cheaper by the parent.
How is that different to the NHS just carrying out the work with no bill to pay? Surely they'd think we can do it cheaper? //
I'm not sure you could say "always" but certainly for now, almost certainly in your lifetime and probably in your child's lifetime. there may be a political aspiration to make the NHS a commercial supplier but at this time, the insurance scheme that would be required to ensure users could afford the service just isn't there, and it would be political suicide for any party to attempt to do that in any time frame that wasn't long-term.
and the organisation needs to do what it does best, and if someone else can do it better, then you let them. given the size of the NHS the overheads are huge, and peripheral services can't always be done cheaper by the parent.
Seems like the NHS can just pay a private company to do their work for them then let them.
I would have thought a government entity would benefit from running itself to save money and have control over every possible financial issue from toilet paper to surgical equipment rather than a private company charging the NHS what it likes or deems fit.
Private companies will be making money on every aspect of their treatment.
Why would the NHS pay more for a private company to do work that they could do?
I would have thought a government entity would benefit from running itself to save money and have control over every possible financial issue from toilet paper to surgical equipment rather than a private company charging the NHS what it likes or deems fit.
Private companies will be making money on every aspect of their treatment.
Why would the NHS pay more for a private company to do work that they could do?
//I would have thought a government entity would benefit from running itself to save money //
not always. if it was the case that the government were always "the best", there would be dentistry services run by the NHS, but in general there aren't (except the hospital services such as the Birmingham Dental Hospital). Dentist's surgeries often have NHS contracts and will see NHS patients (such as the BUPA run dental practice in Settle, nth Yorks) at the discounted (subsidised) NHS rates. the practices get paid for the services they provide, they don't get to charge the NHS for toilet paper or any of their equipment, unless specifically covered in their contract.
not always. if it was the case that the government were always "the best", there would be dentistry services run by the NHS, but in general there aren't (except the hospital services such as the Birmingham Dental Hospital). Dentist's surgeries often have NHS contracts and will see NHS patients (such as the BUPA run dental practice in Settle, nth Yorks) at the discounted (subsidised) NHS rates. the practices get paid for the services they provide, they don't get to charge the NHS for toilet paper or any of their equipment, unless specifically covered in their contract.
//Mushroom, what I mean is where a private company may be able to get surgical equipment for £250 the NHS may be able to get it for £25 being a government entity //
er, no. my son's MRI department needed some surgical disinfectant wipes. A barrel of just what they needed, £4-99 from Wilco. through the NHS stores system, £16-50. there you go.
er, no. my son's MRI department needed some surgical disinfectant wipes. A barrel of just what they needed, £4-99 from Wilco. through the NHS stores system, £16-50. there you go.
"£4-99 from Wilco. through the NHS stores system, £16-50. there you go."
Bloody heck, and they wonder where their money is going!?
My mate use to work for a taxi firm. The local hospital needed a doctor from Portsmouth. The hospital sent a private taxi there to pick him up. It cost the NHS over 6 thousand pounds for one taxi journey there to grab him and bring him back.
Bloody heck, and they wonder where their money is going!?
My mate use to work for a taxi firm. The local hospital needed a doctor from Portsmouth. The hospital sent a private taxi there to pick him up. It cost the NHS over 6 thousand pounds for one taxi journey there to grab him and bring him back.