jackdaw, before you recommend firing some nuclear weapons off and killing innocent people, are you certain that Iran has no nuclear ability, or some friends that do?
jackdaw, before you recommend firing some nuclear weapons off and killing innocent people, are you certain that Iran has no nuclear ability, or some friends that do?
Davebro, fair enough but there was no ‘hereafter’ which left a huge vacuum for the many factions there, one trying to out do the other and the birth of ISIS
It’s impossible to say what Iraq or Libya would be like if history had been different.
Syria exploded without outside interference (despite what some claim). It’s hard to see how that could have ended worse.
Promoting regime change when you have little idea what sort of regime you might get in place of the current one is usually reckless.
The two situations in Iraq and Libya were very different.
There’s a difference between intervening and actively pursuing regime change.
The intervention in Libya initially was to prevent a bloodbath in the east of the country when Gaddafi threatened to commit war crimes. That turned out badly but it would have turned out badly anyway as the war in Libya was already raging.
Iraq was more a pute attempt at regime change. Makes little sense unless you know what might come next.
If Trump thinks regime change in Iran is a good idea he is very foolish.
They're firefighting. Doing and claiming anything to try to get the situation back under control. How many they actually convince is a different story.
It now looks as though Iranians are turning against their leaders and calling them liars.
'In some social media clips, protesters can be heard chanting anti-government slogans, including: "They are lying that our enemy is America, our enemy is right here."'
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.