Body & Soul1 min ago
Should Prince Andrew.......
Co-operate or say until you deport Anna Sacoolas, I'm not gonna help??
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by -SharonA-. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Theland - // And to think he was a trade ambassador.
Disgraceful. //
It's doubtful he had to do anything meaningful, just turn up and 'be', and read a few speeches written for him, hardly taxing, but given his odious personality and absence of ability to live in anything anywhere near the real world, that's all we could really expect.
Disgraceful. //
It's doubtful he had to do anything meaningful, just turn up and 'be', and read a few speeches written for him, hardly taxing, but given his odious personality and absence of ability to live in anything anywhere near the real world, that's all we could really expect.
He's immune from giving evidence which in itself is a disgrace,
nope
That is simply untrue:
yup
Bobbisox1ITV news obviously hast seen the Times then JimF?
obviously
moral dont believe everything you read on AB or read in the times.
and BQ and BA to Sharon who is the FIRST to realise parallels between Prince Ange and Sacoolas
and Prince Ange and the President who remember is refusing to allow witnesses to the trial in the senate !
oh the irony - the american lawyers rrailing against the Kings and Queens of europe that they did so much to over throw blah blah blah
and ignoring the american president to who is trying to escape liability by refusing to allow his staff to testify !
Now is it a criminal trial - nope Epstein is dead remember
so what is it?
a claim as far as I can see against the estate.
they are at the deposition stage I think wh we dont have anyway.
so what Prince andrew is under no obligation moral or legal to assist someone suing a dead persons estate
er as free-tee might quip - - - end of !
and it were (but it is not) a criminal process
do you have to give evidence?
nope durrr
you might take the fifth amendment
( oh yeah dat den etc etc)
extradition - nope - having er sex with a girl over sixteen is NOT unlawful in this country so there is no grounds for extradition
( in contrast to for example gunning down a school boy on the wrong side of the road)
nope
That is simply untrue:
yup
Bobbisox1ITV news obviously hast seen the Times then JimF?
obviously
moral dont believe everything you read on AB or read in the times.
and BQ and BA to Sharon who is the FIRST to realise parallels between Prince Ange and Sacoolas
and Prince Ange and the President who remember is refusing to allow witnesses to the trial in the senate !
oh the irony - the american lawyers rrailing against the Kings and Queens of europe that they did so much to over throw blah blah blah
and ignoring the american president to who is trying to escape liability by refusing to allow his staff to testify !
Now is it a criminal trial - nope Epstein is dead remember
so what is it?
a claim as far as I can see against the estate.
they are at the deposition stage I think wh we dont have anyway.
so what Prince andrew is under no obligation moral or legal to assist someone suing a dead persons estate
er as free-tee might quip - - - end of !
and it were (but it is not) a criminal process
do you have to give evidence?
nope durrr
you might take the fifth amendment
( oh yeah dat den etc etc)
extradition - nope - having er sex with a girl over sixteen is NOT unlawful in this country so there is no grounds for extradition
( in contrast to for example gunning down a school boy on the wrong side of the road)
alodda these points were covered R4 this pm on news at five
xc for there exists an assisted deposition interview system whereby the other side can ask a judge in London to summon the Prince and apply questions to him
but wont apparently if he shows a resistance to answer (er didnt quite understand that bit)
Mme Barrister who was having her 15 m of fame and free advertising did NOT like being asked if FBI were a recognised official investigation agency / court authority
and yes he could plead the fifth - very huffily she pointed out that we used a different phrase.
xc for there exists an assisted deposition interview system whereby the other side can ask a judge in London to summon the Prince and apply questions to him
but wont apparently if he shows a resistance to answer (er didnt quite understand that bit)
Mme Barrister who was having her 15 m of fame and free advertising did NOT like being asked if FBI were a recognised official investigation agency / court authority
and yes he could plead the fifth - very huffily she pointed out that we used a different phrase.
//Did he actually do anything meaningful in the Navy?
He is always portrayed as a hero. //
After the loss of naval vessels due to Argentinian strikes with Exocet missiles the Task Force commander was aware that the missiles could be seen approaching on radar but were so fast there was no time for evasive maneuvering to avoid them.
The aircraft carriers were vital. If they were lost then there would be no Combat Air Patrol (C.A.P.)
Helicopters were deployed to hover above these ships to act as decoys to lure any incoming Exocets away from the capital ships. Modern military aircraft and VIP aircraft fire flares to attract heat seeking missiles.
Prince Andrew and other Fleet Air Arm pilots flew these dangerous missions to protect and shield the fleet.
and then the stuppid donkey went on tel and told the world what the British countermeasures were
flying at an ang;e so that the exocet would follow the helicopter image.
oops
when the press er pressed him on whether he had phoned home and did he speak to his mother?
he frostily answered yes I did speak to her majesty....
thereby squandering any hope of a positive press reception
silly fellow ! and hey he seems to have got up to something sillier later on
yeah and if he makes it into the max secirity slammer in the Land of the Free - will he be deemed a 'flight risk' haw haw haw
he did this to himself and what he wants to speak to the police for god only knows
flying at an ang;e so that the exocet would follow the helicopter image.
oops
when the press er pressed him on whether he had phoned home and did he speak to his mother?
he frostily answered yes I did speak to her majesty....
thereby squandering any hope of a positive press reception
silly fellow ! and hey he seems to have got up to something sillier later on
yeah and if he makes it into the max secirity slammer in the Land of the Free - will he be deemed a 'flight risk' haw haw haw
he did this to himself and what he wants to speak to the police for god only knows
Today, PA is on record as saying that he is willing to co-operate, but he hasn't been asked!
In the same piece, it says that he has been in discussions with he legal team 'most days' about this issue, so it's a little difficult to believe that a team of lawyers have not been in communication with the FBI, if they are keen to talk to him.
What does he think - their letter got lost in the post?
In the same piece, it says that he has been in discussions with he legal team 'most days' about this issue, so it's a little difficult to believe that a team of lawyers have not been in communication with the FBI, if they are keen to talk to him.
What does he think - their letter got lost in the post?
