News7 mins ago
Grenfell 2
21 Answers
only a few days in and all the contractors are pointing their fingers at each other and pulling "the shaggy defence" - and now asking for legal immunity For Funks Sake
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-51296 935
what chance this not descending into a mire of acrimony and the bereaved getting any closure?
https:/
what chance this not descending into a mire of acrimony and the bereaved getting any closure?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I attended an interesting seminar yesterday morning, the main strand of which was how the Grenfell Disaster (and the findings/reports) would impact on the wider Design and Construction community.
It was well attended and there was a large group of senior Fire Officers present.
I found out some very interesting things and can quite understand why there is so much finger-pointing and blame-shifting. It really will take the Judgement of Solomon to decide who should shoulder the blame....
It was well attended and there was a large group of senior Fire Officers present.
I found out some very interesting things and can quite understand why there is so much finger-pointing and blame-shifting. It really will take the Judgement of Solomon to decide who should shoulder the blame....
All those who were privy to the emails that were floating around should be held responsible, imho. All were aware of how the cladding would react in a blaze yet none had the decency to warn would be users. I really do hope these people suffer the very worst nightmares every time they lay down and close their eyes.
I must be careful about what I say here. We know the owner of a firm which tendered for the refurbishment job at Grenfell (that sort of contract is their main area of business). Their tender quoted for correctly fireproofed cladding and its fitting to accepted standards. They lost the contract by a biggish sum. Someone, some committee, must have gone for the cheapest option, and it must have been a lot cheaper, without understanding the issues. The owner is hoping to be called to give evidence - but doubts it will happen.
zm - That's the badger! 11 metres.... :o)
I'd also be asking Hotpoint/Electrolux, etc. quite how one of their appliances managed to fail so spectacularly as to have caused the blaze, in the first place.
The entire tragedy seemed to be a conflux of 'million-to-one' events all happening in the same place at the same time.
I'd also be asking Hotpoint/Electrolux, etc. quite how one of their appliances managed to fail so spectacularly as to have caused the blaze, in the first place.
The entire tragedy seemed to be a conflux of 'million-to-one' events all happening in the same place at the same time.
Some interesting information here:
https:/ /www.pb ctoday. co.uk/n ews/bui lding-c ontrol- news/gr enfell- tower-p hase-2/ 70858/
https:/
no shortage of Hotpoints going up in flames, it seems
https:/ /www.th eanswer bank.co .uk/New s/Quest ion1692 857.htm l
https:/