They Can’T Have It All Ways !

Bobbisox1 | 08:18 Wed 19th Feb 2020 | News

67 Answers

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1244189/meghan-markle-news-sussex-royal-brand-ban-prince-harry-the-queen-royal-latest

He opted to go it alone with his wife and rebrand themselves , the Queen has rightly so said they will not be allowed the word Royal in their venture

Immigration

Well Done, Rosie.

Answers

21 to 40 of 67

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

ladybirder

Best Answer

Anne, I would hate their job. My point is Wills and Kate would be away from their family too much, up and down the country, tours abroad. Why take a young couple away from their young family more than they already are? I know you hate the RF but come on, surely you can't disagree with what I'm saying? Let Charles do it, he's been waiting long enough;-)

11:24 Wed 19th Feb 2020

Go To Best Answer

Bobbisox1

Question Author

Ken, not so,I wish them well in their future endeavours but my point is you can’t be un -Royal but want to use the brand to further their lifestyle

vulcan42

I had an American friend whose first names were Royal and Thomas and like a lot of Americans wrote his name as Royal T M....... It amused him to refer to himself as Royalty. I'm wondering if Royal is used as a christian name can it be banned as part of a trade name?

Bobbisox1

Question Author

Quite complex I suppose Vulcan , after all we have pubs called The Royal etc but I think in the couples case , perhaps HM felt the titles were being ‘exploited’ ?

Old_Geezer

Regardless of what has occurred, it seems perfectly reasonable to me that those not undertaking royal "duties" ought not be able to link their endeavours to being royal. Having the privilege to be born into the family seems an inadequate justification.

Old_Geezer

I think one knows when there is reasonable justification for using the word, for example it being a given surname, and it bring used simply to cash in on those wanting products or services connected to royalty. (That said, some powerful existing companies still bully smaller ones who legitimately have a reason to use a similar name.)

Old_Geezer

...it bEing used...

TheDevil

"They Can’T Have It All Ways !"

They don't want it all ways.

TheDevil

"We’re happy with our Queen,William and Kate now"

Don't talk for other people.

Bobbisox1

Question Author

^^^^ well those of us who love our Royal Family are :0)

TheDevil

Are you? I'm sure that some would love Charles to be in that mix. You know, the die hard Royal fans.

He is our next king and you left him out.

zebo

We have friends called Royle and they were waiting for a table in a US restaurant when the head waiter came to the foyer and called The Royle family from Engerland, you're table's ready. Caused quite a stir!

Bobbisox1

Question Author

I didn’t say I didn't like Charles, I said I’d prefer for William and Kate to be our next Monarchs, they’re young and could rein a lot longer than Charles and for the record, I do like both him and Camilla

Bobbisox1

Question Author

I bet it did Zebo, the Americans seem to love our Royals don’t they?

TheDevil

"I didn’t say I didn't like Charles"

I didn't say that you didn't like Charles. I said that you left him out of your "we're happy with" list.

I'm just saying some people (Royal fans) will be eager for Charles to take the throne and wont' see why it should skip him. He's done his time and duty, he deserves to rein.

Bobbisox1

Question Author

And they are entitled to think that way too TD

vulcan42

I hope Charles does get bridled if he has to rein.

anneasquith

He certainly HAS done his time. Just how many ribbons must he cut to get the CEO job :-(