ChatterBank1 min ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by barney15c. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I’m not sure she is obliged to give evidence anyway.
I doubt she’ll survive that long. She should plainly never have been appointed in the first place. Regardless of what you think it her views, or the allegations of bullying, she plainly has neither the ability or the wit to push through her radical ideas.
I doubt she’ll survive that long. She should plainly never have been appointed in the first place. Regardless of what you think it her views, or the allegations of bullying, she plainly has neither the ability or the wit to push through her radical ideas.
Yes I’m afraid Mr Rutnam is an archetypal career bureaucrat. He’s never really had a proper job unless you count a spell with Morgan Stanley. He obviously realised that “public service” was a far better career option than the tiresome business of having to contribute to an organisation which aimed to satisfy shareholders and where he ran the risk of being called to account. Far better to have politicians take the rap for your ineptitude so he joined the Civil Service in 1987. Since then he’s shunted himself around various positions (including a spell at Ofcom) no doubt receiving a generous promotion and pay rise on each occasion. His performance on the telly over the weekend was truly pathetic, almost in tears telling everybody how he had been bullied into submission by the Most Vile and Evil Home Secretary the World Has Ever Known.
The current batch of senior Civil Servants have had their own way for far too long. Their concerted efforts, along with their Parliamentary allies, almost cost the country a proper Brexit or indeed any Brexit at all. It’s taken almost four years to see them finally declared as batting for the losing side and they don’t like it. I think we can expect to see more examples where those who cannot deal with the New Order seek to blame somebody else for their shortcomings.
The current batch of senior Civil Servants have had their own way for far too long. Their concerted efforts, along with their Parliamentary allies, almost cost the country a proper Brexit or indeed any Brexit at all. It’s taken almost four years to see them finally declared as batting for the losing side and they don’t like it. I think we can expect to see more examples where those who cannot deal with the New Order seek to blame somebody else for their shortcomings.
The staff member's grievance letter alleges she had previously attempted to kill herself after reporting similar allegations of workplace bullying concerning another individual in 2014, before Ms Patel was a minister.
So the person had previous
Secondly this never came to Court and so still remains alleged.
Interestingly a settlement was reached in 2017 for £25,000 after the member of staff threatened to bring a legal claim of bullying, harassment and discrimination on the grounds of race and disability against the department, including Ms Patel who is directly named.
So race and disabilty card played, hence no Court case.
So the person had previous
Secondly this never came to Court and so still remains alleged.
Interestingly a settlement was reached in 2017 for £25,000 after the member of staff threatened to bring a legal claim of bullying, harassment and discrimination on the grounds of race and disability against the department, including Ms Patel who is directly named.
So race and disabilty card played, hence no Court case.
//Yes I’m afraid Mr Rutnam is an archetypal career bureaucrat.//
a bit like a judge den new judge ?
oh no you will say - judges are wonderful himan beings who have honed a career in the cut and thrust of courts in the strand and old bailey - therein is all life, raw bleeding, and er something else
well , a bit like a judge den new judge ?
a bit like a judge den new judge ?
oh no you will say - judges are wonderful himan beings who have honed a career in the cut and thrust of courts in the strand and old bailey - therein is all life, raw bleeding, and er something else
well , a bit like a judge den new judge ?
//What one person sees as bullying another might brush off.//
Indeed. Many workers in the public sector seem remarkably fragile. Life's tough sometimes and if you have a boss or a colleague who is not treating you as you would like you have to deal with it. Almost all workers come across it from time to time. Mr Rutnam is supposed to be (or was) the Permanent Secretary at the Home Office. In a similarly sized organisation in the private sector he would be expected to deal with what he perceives to be "bullying" without running to the press, the telly or the courts. Of course we don't know all the details but it strikes me that he has an extremely wide view of what "bullying" entails. Senior Civil Servants are in a unique position in that they have a politician who must take the flack when things go wrong. They should savour that position (which would be a luxury undreamed of by most workers) and not whinge. I have a strong suspicion that his perceived bullying stemmed from being told a few home truths and being instructed to get on and do as he was told. It probably hasn't happened to him before and as a man who received a Knighthood for "public service" (aka doing his job) he's struggling to cope.
Indeed. Many workers in the public sector seem remarkably fragile. Life's tough sometimes and if you have a boss or a colleague who is not treating you as you would like you have to deal with it. Almost all workers come across it from time to time. Mr Rutnam is supposed to be (or was) the Permanent Secretary at the Home Office. In a similarly sized organisation in the private sector he would be expected to deal with what he perceives to be "bullying" without running to the press, the telly or the courts. Of course we don't know all the details but it strikes me that he has an extremely wide view of what "bullying" entails. Senior Civil Servants are in a unique position in that they have a politician who must take the flack when things go wrong. They should savour that position (which would be a luxury undreamed of by most workers) and not whinge. I have a strong suspicion that his perceived bullying stemmed from being told a few home truths and being instructed to get on and do as he was told. It probably hasn't happened to him before and as a man who received a Knighthood for "public service" (aka doing his job) he's struggling to cope.
// Senior Civil Servants are in a unique position in that they have a politician who must take the flack when things go wrong.//
This is true, but Civil Servants are also in the unique position of being literally not allowed to defend themselves from undue criticism.
It's been long known within the CS just what a terrible boss Patel is. I don't give two hoots about her politics -- her behaviour to her staff has always been appalling. It should be objectively unacceptable to bully and belittle people.
This is true, but Civil Servants are also in the unique position of being literally not allowed to defend themselves from undue criticism.
It's been long known within the CS just what a terrible boss Patel is. I don't give two hoots about her politics -- her behaviour to her staff has always been appalling. It should be objectively unacceptable to bully and belittle people.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.