Donate SIGN UP

Answers

61 to 80 of 119rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by royfromaus. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
dannyk13
Roy why do you want to open up the argument again?




You've got me there...what argument have I opened up?
From memory was there not something a while ago about answers being easy to delete in error and the ED introduced an extra step to stop that?
Obviously didn't work.
//What does a thread look like when it has been closed accidentally?//

Exactly the same, but without the answer box.
Question Author
What does a thread look like when it has been closed vindictively?


Exactly the same, but without the answer box.
Almost by definition, if the thread were closed accidentally then no mod would open up because they wouldn't have noticed.

A mistake was made. We're been told repeatedly that it's easily made. Maybe it shouldn't be so easy to make that mistake, but there we are. Time to move on back to the subject.
That's why I suggested adding an extra step to confirm the closure.
That's great, corby. Only you didn't say that, did you?
11:05 Monday Spicerack.
Do try and keep up
It's all very well for you to say 'move on', jim. You're holding the clean end of the *** stick.
We're repeatedly told that Mods have to write a report justifying their actions and the Ed reads all those reports. (so must agree with the Mod's action)
Both of those stories can't be true unless Mods are accidentally writing a report to go with these 'accidents'.
Incidentally, the same Mod tells us that Mods can't remove posts from threads they're involved in.
One of you needs to go on a refresher course.
Oh right, Oz. I just read the one above where he said the Ed had added another step.
So he wants an extra step on top of the extra step. I reckon that'd fix it.

Answers being deleted and threads being closed are two different procedures Spicerack.
Do try and keep up ;-)
I didn't stipulate one or the other, oz. That's why I used the word 'actions'.
You seem to know a lot about. Don't tell me they even gave you a button?
One will never know
Both stories *can* be true, spicerack. We've been told repeatedly by eg buenchico that thread closing is a simple one-click button, whereas post deletion etc requires a report to be submitted alongside the report process. One can be done accidentally, the other cannot.

//We've been told repeatedly by eg buenchico//

Why are you citing buenchico? You must know how it works, Jim.

Incidentally, that mods aren't allowed to remove posts on threads they're involved in is a fallacy. They can - and do.
Naomi,how do you know which particular moderator has removed a post from a thread?
One of the advantages of having a good memory, I suppose, Naomi. I remember what people have said about it in the past, always helps to know something.

I'm not sure what Spicey meant about mods being unable to delete posts in threads they're involved in. I thought the mod who said that merely meant that they personally don't.
It is what it is folk, there no real point in getting het up about it. It is annoying when a thread is closed without explanation, or a post removed without warning but there's Jack Schitt we can do about it.

61 to 80 of 119rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last