News5 mins ago
Interpol Red Notice Issued For Anne Sacoolas.
22 Answers
About time this disgraceful woman was brought to justice? What say you?
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ladybirder. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes definitely TTT. The Guardian confirms it. Pity they can't arrest her in the USA.
https:/
https:/
Not much interest in this topic I see but this woman infuriates me.
The BBC has said in the past hour that:
// The US has said its decision to refuse an extradition request for Harry Dunn's alleged killer was final.
It comes amid claims that US national Anne Sacoolas was "wanted internationally" after an Interpol Red notice was issued.
A US State Department spokeswoman maintained that she had diplomatic immunity from criminal jurisdiction. \\.
The BBC has said in the past hour that:
// The US has said its decision to refuse an extradition request for Harry Dunn's alleged killer was final.
It comes amid claims that US national Anne Sacoolas was "wanted internationally" after an Interpol Red notice was issued.
A US State Department spokeswoman maintained that she had diplomatic immunity from criminal jurisdiction. \\.
She did not 'Kill' the poor lad intentionally. She is not a 'killer'. It was an unfortunate accident, probably preventable yes, but an accident. She has made is so much worse for herself by absconding. If she had stayed to face the music and given a heartfelt apology to the parents, this would have all ben over and done with months ago. At the most she would have probably got a fine and banned from driving. Now she is wanted by Interpol -what a stupid woman she is.
What an example she must be to he own children.
I agree Aunt Polly, she really couldn't have made it worse for herself if she tried, or for the victim's family.
Zacs I wonder how much not being able to leave the States will affect her. I don't know enough about her to know if she regularly travelled here or anywhere else.
Perhaps a change of government might bring about a different scenario.
I see all of the above has not stopped some Americans stationed at the base driving on the wrong side of the road where Harry was killed.
I agree Aunt Polly, she really couldn't have made it worse for herself if she tried, or for the victim's family.
Zacs I wonder how much not being able to leave the States will affect her. I don't know enough about her to know if she regularly travelled here or anywhere else.
Perhaps a change of government might bring about a different scenario.
I see all of the above has not stopped some Americans stationed at the base driving on the wrong side of the road where Harry was killed.
//If she had stayed to face the music and given a heartfelt apology to the parents, this would have all ben over and done with months ago. At the most she would have probably got a fine and banned from driving.//
Or possibly not.
She is wanted on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving. This is a "serious offence" for the purposes of s.224 Criminal Justice Act 2003 and the maximum sentence is 14 years' custody. Even for the least serious example of the offence the sentencing guidelines suggest a "Starting Point" of 3 years with a "Range" of 2 to 5 years. If convicted of that offence a fine would not be a consideration and custody all but inevitable.
Even if convicted of the alternative, lesser offence of causing death by careless driving, this carries a maximum sentence of 5 years. The starting point for the least serious example ("Careless or inconsiderate driving arising from momentary inattention with no aggravating factors") is a community order and custody a consideration for any case more serious. A fine for that offence would also not be considered.
She would definitely be banned for the more serious offence (minimum 2 years) and almost certainly for the lesser offence.
Or possibly not.
She is wanted on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving. This is a "serious offence" for the purposes of s.224 Criminal Justice Act 2003 and the maximum sentence is 14 years' custody. Even for the least serious example of the offence the sentencing guidelines suggest a "Starting Point" of 3 years with a "Range" of 2 to 5 years. If convicted of that offence a fine would not be a consideration and custody all but inevitable.
Even if convicted of the alternative, lesser offence of causing death by careless driving, this carries a maximum sentence of 5 years. The starting point for the least serious example ("Careless or inconsiderate driving arising from momentary inattention with no aggravating factors") is a community order and custody a consideration for any case more serious. A fine for that offence would also not be considered.
She would definitely be banned for the more serious offence (minimum 2 years) and almost certainly for the lesser offence.
LB, the lecture is mentioned at the bottom of this article
https:/
https:/
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
ChatterBank7 mins ago
ChatterBank9 mins ago
Crosswords9 mins ago
Lord Peter Mandelson, Uk Ambassador
News10 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.