retrocop - //
//Retrocop, Mr Peston must irk you well beyond the realms of simple annoyance to prompt you to track down a 'character assassination', and reproduce it here for people who probably aren't bothered.//
Not at all. Mr Preston has an annoying presentation of the news which many find annoying.
As you have piled into my previous musings and opinion with some additional information I decided to check the veracity of what you wrote. After all it's not the first time you have jumped into a thread dispensing misinformation in order to put down another ABers opinion in order to make your self look smart. Why use 100 words when you can use 10.? It's called waffle and I recall a few years back you attempted to misinform a question posed here and emphatically and categorically stated that the highest purchase and ownership of cell phones in the world belonged to the UK. A simple google proved that this was total nonsense and you made it up to make yourself look smart. You failed. Since then I have learnt to take all you say with a pinch of salt and double check your statements as I would not believe it if you told me there was a Y in Wednesday. As you did not supply a link to back up your statement I decided to check up on a few sites to verify . I found quite a few paragraphs with regard to his speech anomalies but no definitive proof he suffered from a stammer. More likely an affected intonation. The BBC attempted to send him to a speech therapist, as they had with other broadcasters, to 'polish up' his speech delivery. He declined their offer.
As a niece of mine is a qualified speech therapist about to take up a post at the London Hospital Whitechapel she has to do a little more than 'polish up' some unfortunate with a pronounced stammer.
It has been claimed that Mr Peston suffers nerves on screen and would be better employed as a press journalist.
So in conclusion. Mr Peston does not irk or irritate me to that extent and if you hadn't jumped in with your usual school masterly attempt to censure my opinion I wouldn't have bothered to find evidence that what you ,again ,opined was misleading information.
I hope that has fully explained the reasons for my research ,which you chose to comment on ,and as I suggested earlier, I think we can leave it there if you could manage that . A link ,provided by you, of course, would have been helpful. //
Goodness, do you feel better now?
I was merely making an observation, there's really no need to go to Defcon 3 over it!
Have a lie down and a rest, you must need it after all that pointless diatribe!!!