ChatterBank4 mins ago
Good! Mandatory To Wear Masks On Public Transport In England In Mid June
https:/ /www.st andard. co.uk/n ews/pol itics/f ace-cov erings- mandato ry-on-a ll-publ ic-tran sport-e ngland- grant-s happs-a 4460136 .html
I’ve no problem with this at all, save people not sending their sneezes your way
But why wait till mid June, why not now ?
I’ve no problem with this at all, save people not sending their sneezes your way
But why wait till mid June, why not now ?
Answers
To be pedantic, it won't be mandatory to wear 'masks' (as in the title of your post) but only to wear 'face coverings'. The official advice has always been (and, as far as I know, still is) that purpose-made face masks should only be worn by those who're in contact with people who're displaying Covid-19 symptoms or by certain other health professional s. If...
16:45 Thu 04th Jun 2020
// But why wait till mid June, why not now ?//
not of course wishing to pick holes in a seamless logical arguement BUT
because there is no good evidence that it works
EVEN at the end of the covid prog - a cabinet minister squeezed in - and t"the evidence for masks is - - poor"
non existent that is !
and we had - sorry I do go on about an evidence base, or lack of one here - it is something to do with being a scientist I think , Prof Trishuh Greenhalgh saying "well it stands to reason innit" said she in an essex brogue, " in Germany the rates went down after they started wearing masks so the same iwll happen here"
Hi Trish if any student in final MB said - "I did this and the patient was better after so it must be because wot I done" - you would fail then wouldnt you for the screaming fallacy post hoc ergo propter hoc(*)?
(*) Boris uses Latin so why shouldnt I?
not of course wishing to pick holes in a seamless logical arguement BUT
because there is no good evidence that it works
EVEN at the end of the covid prog - a cabinet minister squeezed in - and t"the evidence for masks is - - poor"
non existent that is !
and we had - sorry I do go on about an evidence base, or lack of one here - it is something to do with being a scientist I think , Prof Trishuh Greenhalgh saying "well it stands to reason innit" said she in an essex brogue, " in Germany the rates went down after they started wearing masks so the same iwll happen here"
Hi Trish if any student in final MB said - "I did this and the patient was better after so it must be because wot I done" - you would fail then wouldnt you for the screaming fallacy post hoc ergo propter hoc(*)?
(*) Boris uses Latin so why shouldnt I?
A lead in time is needed so proper notice can be given- posters/signs will be put up, people without them can be given personal reminders rather than being turned away, people have time to make them and also get used to wearing them properly. Maybe a week's notice would have been enough.
Also I don't think it's urgent. Could easily have been a week later. I partly share PPs view about their limitations although I think they are of limited benefit rather than of no use. Many wearers don't use them properly- I see lots with them under their chins, touching them regularly, taking them down to speak, not covering noses and ignoring social distancing when they wear them.
Also I don't think it's urgent. Could easily have been a week later. I partly share PPs view about their limitations although I think they are of limited benefit rather than of no use. Many wearers don't use them properly- I see lots with them under their chins, touching them regularly, taking them down to speak, not covering noses and ignoring social distancing when they wear them.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.