Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Will Justice Prevail?
22 Answers
For a long time I have been watching the trial of Vitaly Orlov/Norebo. Has anyone heard of this situation? If not, here's the source - https:/
Although, as for me, no matter what problems the big bosses have, first of all the consumer will suffer.
Although, as for me, no matter what problems the big bosses have, first of all the consumer will suffer.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by DaisyBlack666. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
This post feels a little like spam, to be honest.
Or it’s Tugushev’s lawyer - or more likely relative - trying to drum up support :-)
I think it’s fair to say that the cod-consuming masses of Britain and further afield won’t be greatly affected - whether it goes in favour of Tweedledum or Tweedledee.
Or it’s Tugushev’s lawyer - or more likely relative - trying to drum up support :-)
I think it’s fair to say that the cod-consuming masses of Britain and further afield won’t be greatly affected - whether it goes in favour of Tweedledum or Tweedledee.
"A UK court recently concluded that even when there’s ample evidence demonstrating connections to another state, UK courts may nonetheless affirm their own jurisdiction, if there are at least some connections providing a basis to do so... According to the court, while the jurisdiction dispute generated a “depressingly vast amount of material” and “clearly left no stone unturned,” the evidence was sufficient for Tugushev to successfully resist Orlov’s challenge and demonstrate a “good arguable case” that Orlov was domiciled in England and, in turn, that the court had jurisdiction to hear Tugushev’s claims.
While the court found that Orlov spends the majority of his time in Russia, it nonetheless concluded that England is a “settled and usual place of abode” for Orlov on the basis of evidence that, among other things, Orlov owns two flats in England, had recently made significant payments in respect of the properties (although had spent just 56 days in England in 2017, and 25.5 days in England up to the July 23, 2018 freeze order)...
...there would seem to be no a priori reason why any plaintiff should not be allowed to sue in the jurisdiction seen as most favorable to advancing its claim... More recently, Canadian courts have confirmed their willingness to assert jurisdiction in novel circumstances,"
The more lucre the better?
Welcome to your first day on-board DaisyBlack666.
https:/
While the court found that Orlov spends the majority of his time in Russia, it nonetheless concluded that England is a “settled and usual place of abode” for Orlov on the basis of evidence that, among other things, Orlov owns two flats in England, had recently made significant payments in respect of the properties (although had spent just 56 days in England in 2017, and 25.5 days in England up to the July 23, 2018 freeze order)...
...there would seem to be no a priori reason why any plaintiff should not be allowed to sue in the jurisdiction seen as most favorable to advancing its claim... More recently, Canadian courts have confirmed their willingness to assert jurisdiction in novel circumstances,"
The more lucre the better?
Welcome to your first day on-board DaisyBlack666.
https:/
// The more lucre the better?//
a lucre explanation
and wait! there is a strange silence - where are all the disembodied screams that we left the european union on just this point - to express our englishness and sovereignty and NOT to extend our largesse and justice to other countries
screams there are none - the commercial courts are very willing to hear international cases - there has to be some sort of lead-in, here two flats he owned
a lucre explanation
and wait! there is a strange silence - where are all the disembodied screams that we left the european union on just this point - to express our englishness and sovereignty and NOT to extend our largesse and justice to other countries
screams there are none - the commercial courts are very willing to hear international cases - there has to be some sort of lead-in, here two flats he owned
// Russophobia and grudge combined, how interesting.//
is vitaly's case vital ?
no russophobia and we all have grudges dear 7up
Ich was the one who spectac unearthed the actual transmissions of the crew that shot down the airliner = which had made it onto the internet somewhere
as a result I read each of his posts - Hi Itchy ! - 7ups q and a are worth a read
is vitaly's case vital ?
no russophobia and we all have grudges dear 7up
Ich was the one who spectac unearthed the actual transmissions of the crew that shot down the airliner = which had made it onto the internet somewhere
as a result I read each of his posts - Hi Itchy ! - 7ups q and a are worth a read
"is vitaly's case vital ?"
It could be vital for either litigant, but it glaringly exposes the blatant 'alternative' Legal avenues that exist for the wealthy, kinda kicks you in your moral wallet, and is a good personification of 'wealth privilege'. ( classism's close brother)
PP. some people justify greater scrutiny by dint of their prior recorded output (only if that output has been read by the scrutineer *of course* ) and 'open source ' exposés warrant greater scrutiny if originating from social media (facebook, 4chan, twitter,answerbank even, etc )
It could be vital for either litigant, but it glaringly exposes the blatant 'alternative' Legal avenues that exist for the wealthy, kinda kicks you in your moral wallet, and is a good personification of 'wealth privilege'. ( classism's close brother)
PP. some people justify greater scrutiny by dint of their prior recorded output (only if that output has been read by the scrutineer *of course* ) and 'open source ' exposés warrant greater scrutiny if originating from social media (facebook, 4chan, twitter,answerbank even, etc )
I suspect “Daisy” god bless her has done her bit and we don’t hear from her again.
It is strange how people pop out of the woodwork at odd times :-)
Obviously this case is of huge importance to the protagonists but probably not to anyone else.
Peter you are very kind, but re the MH17 mass murder, I was only reporting what was available from news reports, being “interested”
The SBU did all the hard work
It is strange how people pop out of the woodwork at odd times :-)
Obviously this case is of huge importance to the protagonists but probably not to anyone else.
Peter you are very kind, but re the MH17 mass murder, I was only reporting what was available from news reports, being “interested”
The SBU did all the hard work
Latest Posts
Spam & Scams7 mins ago
Reeves Is Now After Your Pension Funds
News20 mins ago
Editor's Blog46 mins ago
Body & Soul48 mins ago
