Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Pc Harper Widow 'Horrified' At Killers' Reported £465K Legal Aid Costs
https:/
I don’t know how much compensation Lissie may receive for the loss of her husband in such appalling circumstances - not that any amount will really compensate - but spending money on low-lives like these people sticks in the craw a bit. Yes, I know … they're 'entitled'.
I don’t know how much compensation Lissie may receive for the loss of her husband in such appalling circumstances - not that any amount will really compensate - but spending money on low-lives like these people sticks in the craw a bit. Yes, I know … they're 'entitled'.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
// //PP is a legal beagle?//
No, he isn't, tamborine.
quite true Naomi - I just have law O level - I think Naomi hasnt turned her irony klaxon on today
this is quite useful for homicide
https:/
and some one true to AB principles ( the one that says "I do not know my arriss from my elbow") has called them convicted murderers
nope - manslaughter - see ref above
No, he isn't, tamborine.
quite true Naomi - I just have law O level - I think Naomi hasnt turned her irony klaxon on today
this is quite useful for homicide
https:/
and some one true to AB principles ( the one that says "I do not know my arriss from my elbow") has called them convicted murderers
nope - manslaughter - see ref above
talking a bit above Naomis level
In a legal aid drugs case - the Crown failed to take into account it was transnational - and failed to get the AG's permission ( NOT a rubber stamp) - so it was dismissed, and the defence got a 'wasted costs order' and bunged in a b ill (oops fee note!) over a million
( smackers, spondoolees, knicker, sterling)
https:/
just upping the standard of discussion
In a legal aid drugs case - the Crown failed to take into account it was transnational - and failed to get the AG's permission ( NOT a rubber stamp) - so it was dismissed, and the defence got a 'wasted costs order' and bunged in a b ill (oops fee note!) over a million
( smackers, spondoolees, knicker, sterling)
https:/
just upping the standard of discussion
//Tamborine, dragging him for more than a mile was no accident.//
I meet up with Thames Valley Police Officers once a month.The secretary of the club is a long term friend of 65 years standing. Naturally the mood has been very sombre in past weeks. I have been told that one of the accused admitted they turned up the car radio to drown out the screams of PC Andrew Harper as they knowingly dragged him along the lane for a mile. Murder ? Yes imo .
I meet up with Thames Valley Police Officers once a month.The secretary of the club is a long term friend of 65 years standing. Naturally the mood has been very sombre in past weeks. I have been told that one of the accused admitted they turned up the car radio to drown out the screams of PC Andrew Harper as they knowingly dragged him along the lane for a mile. Murder ? Yes imo .
//RETRO, was that "admission" presented in evidence during the trial? //
Apparently, according to pixie374, it seems it was. I did not follow all the reported trial proceedings in the media. I am relaying what I was told by a serving TVP officer. A rhetorical question was muted at the time.It went, words to the effect," How the f*** can they be charged with manslaughter when they admitted in interview they turned up the car radio to drown out the PC's screams as they dragged him behind them?"
If that was indeed an admission by one of them all I can say further is 'their time will come'.
//Giving evidence, Long admitted being a habitual thief who had been involved in many police chases before.
On the night Pc Harper died, he said it was chaos inside the car and he ordered the radio to be turned up to drown out his passengers’ shouting.//
https:/
On the night Pc Harper died, he said it was chaos inside the car and he ordered the radio to be turned up to drown out his passengers’ shouting.//
https:/
Retro, DPP v Smith was a similar set of circumstances:-
https:/
https:/
//"he said it was chaos inside the car and he ordered the radio to be turned up to drown out his passengers’ shouting."//
TCL
If you believe that then you have my pity. If you had passengers shouting in your car and giving you GBH of the lugs the last thing,I would suggest,is to create more noise by turning up the radio. You would order your passengers to tone it down!!! He didn't slow down or consider cutting free PC Harper from the entanglement. He just blotted out his screams by turning up the radio.
TCL
If you believe that then you have my pity. If you had passengers shouting in your car and giving you GBH of the lugs the last thing,I would suggest,is to create more noise by turning up the radio. You would order your passengers to tone it down!!! He didn't slow down or consider cutting free PC Harper from the entanglement. He just blotted out his screams by turning up the radio.
-- answer removed --
naomi - // They can hardly appeal on those grounds. They dragged him for more than a mile! //
The entire basis of their defence against a murder charge was that they were unaware that they were dragging a human behind their car.
The prosecution failed to convince the court that they were aware, and that is why they are not guilty of murder.
The entire basis of their defence against a murder charge was that they were unaware that they were dragging a human behind their car.
The prosecution failed to convince the court that they were aware, and that is why they are not guilty of murder.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.