Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Windrush Scandal – Part Ii
Shockingly at least nine people have died before receiving any compensation, worse the level of compensation offered is derisory.
The woman in this story was denied being able to work or receive welfare for almost 10 years while living legally in the UK.
Ask yourself how much compensation you’d want for being treated so appallingly – personally the monetary compensation I’d look to receive (for such treatment) would be the best part of £1,000,000. Yet she was offered £20,000, around £2,000 per year of not being able to work or receive benefits (absolutely disgusting).
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-polit ics-547 48038
The woman in this story was denied being able to work or receive welfare for almost 10 years while living legally in the UK.
Ask yourself how much compensation you’d want for being treated so appallingly – personally the monetary compensation I’d look to receive (for such treatment) would be the best part of £1,000,000. Yet she was offered £20,000, around £2,000 per year of not being able to work or receive benefits (absolutely disgusting).
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hymie. There was a BBC drama-doc last year about a geezer in similar circumstances. Not sure whether he was EVER offered compensation. Anthony Bryan is his name.
My pal Cecil (West Indian, couldn’t have been blacker), used to say after the latest slur, usually from the Harlesden police, “Just as well I ain’t black else I’d REALLY be in trouble.”
My pal Cecil (West Indian, couldn’t have been blacker), used to say after the latest slur, usually from the Harlesden police, “Just as well I ain’t black else I’d REALLY be in trouble.”
I think a fair way of doing it would depend on how much a person may have received in benefits over the 10 years, then add on some for interest. An arbitrary figure such as £1m is just that - arbitrary.
They talk in the article about people being made homeless but make it less clear if that relates to the woman in the article. they talk about people seeing their GP regarding suicide, but again less clear about who (or how they even got to see their GP if they had no recourse to public funds).
They make it even less clear in the article how people who could not work or claim benefits survived for 10 years - what a muddle it all seems to be.
They talk in the article about people being made homeless but make it less clear if that relates to the woman in the article. they talk about people seeing their GP regarding suicide, but again less clear about who (or how they even got to see their GP if they had no recourse to public funds).
They make it even less clear in the article how people who could not work or claim benefits survived for 10 years - what a muddle it all seems to be.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.