ChatterBank4 mins ago
Do You Think That Trump
will put up a big fuss if he loses? He has threatened to go to the Supreme Court to stop any late voting.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Barsel. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.He's already putting up a big fuss. He doesn't want to stop late voting, he wants to stop legitimate votes being counted because he knows that the 'mail in' ones not counted yet will be predominantly Democrat.
He started laying the groundwork for this ploy some months ago when he started making noises about election fraud and mail in votes, for which there's never been any evidence. He subsequently installed a crony as head of the postal service to set about hampering it's ability to provide a service for mailed in votes.
Subsequent to that he rushed through the installation of another crony to the Supreme court in anticipation of the situation we now have where he will use the sc to overturn the result.
There is nothing he won't do to try and remain in power.
He started laying the groundwork for this ploy some months ago when he started making noises about election fraud and mail in votes, for which there's never been any evidence. He subsequently installed a crony as head of the postal service to set about hampering it's ability to provide a service for mailed in votes.
Subsequent to that he rushed through the installation of another crony to the Supreme court in anticipation of the situation we now have where he will use the sc to overturn the result.
There is nothing he won't do to try and remain in power.
He has been making childish threats about what will happen if he loses for months, currently he wants to suspend counting and as he's packed the Supreme Court ahead of the election that could be interesting. Apparently the Electoral College meets in December to declare the result, if there is still no officlal result by January 20th then Nancy Pelosi will become President, which should please Trump, not! I would love to see that scenario.
He's already putting up a huge fuss and he hasn't even lost yet.
He's clearly one of the world's sorest losers -- allowing and encouraging crowds to chant "lock her/him up!" for his political opponents, calling fraud, touting conspiracy theories, etc, are not the mark of a man humble in defeat. But what bothers me is that he really needn't be like this. It's likely to be a defeat, but a defeat far less spectacular than many had expected/hoped for. And it's a defeat that sets the tone for four years of stalemate and arguing and continued infighting, in which very little will be done. It seems that the Lower House is going to the Democrats, but by less than previously; the Republicans will retain control of the Senate; and they've already secured the Supreme Court and many other judicial offices.
If Trump wants to run again in 2024, and he probably will, I'd almost be tempted to call him favourite.
He's clearly one of the world's sorest losers -- allowing and encouraging crowds to chant "lock her/him up!" for his political opponents, calling fraud, touting conspiracy theories, etc, are not the mark of a man humble in defeat. But what bothers me is that he really needn't be like this. It's likely to be a defeat, but a defeat far less spectacular than many had expected/hoped for. And it's a defeat that sets the tone for four years of stalemate and arguing and continued infighting, in which very little will be done. It seems that the Lower House is going to the Democrats, but by less than previously; the Republicans will retain control of the Senate; and they've already secured the Supreme Court and many other judicial offices.
If Trump wants to run again in 2024, and he probably will, I'd almost be tempted to call him favourite.
I think most people can see what he is like as a person, but he has also achieved things that Republicans like. Getting three Supreme Court judges isn't really a Trump thing, so much as a Republican thing, but it's gone on Trump's achievement list all the same.
You'd be surprised, or saddened, how much of US Politics can be related to abortion rights, and Trump has been vocally "pro-life", and sadly that matters more than everything else about him.
You'd be surprised, or saddened, how much of US Politics can be related to abortion rights, and Trump has been vocally "pro-life", and sadly that matters more than everything else about him.
// to stop any late voting.//
nope counting
late vote counting
you dont count postal votes until the day so that the news doesnt leak out that X is ahead and influence the way the future voters to be will cast their vote
but I notice that some governors have ordered that the postal votes are counted first and so WILL be counted on the day and those cast on the day at polling stations will be counted a day or so later
only in America
DId any one hear Farage getting slapped around by Andrew Neil? - corrupt voting in Birmingham
and Neil said Brum Midlands UK innit
and the Nige had to agree
we have electoral courts and none of this supreme court crap - last sat 1867 - actually sat in the Brum case and found 26% had been fraudulently cast.
nope counting
late vote counting
you dont count postal votes until the day so that the news doesnt leak out that X is ahead and influence the way the future voters to be will cast their vote
but I notice that some governors have ordered that the postal votes are counted first and so WILL be counted on the day and those cast on the day at polling stations will be counted a day or so later
only in America
DId any one hear Farage getting slapped around by Andrew Neil? - corrupt voting in Birmingham
and Neil said Brum Midlands UK innit
and the Nige had to agree
we have electoral courts and none of this supreme court crap - last sat 1867 - actually sat in the Brum case and found 26% had been fraudulently cast.
George Bush got in by 46 000
that was the one where the supreme ct said enough was enough
that was the hanging chad election - a punched hole in a piece of paper the bit cut out is called a chad
and altho I thought the supreme court had called a halt under the excellent principle of
suprema lex:interest rei publicae finis ad litem
they didnt ( non ) - it was because the votes were being counted in different ways in the counties of Floridee
so God knows this time
that was the one where the supreme ct said enough was enough
that was the hanging chad election - a punched hole in a piece of paper the bit cut out is called a chad
and altho I thought the supreme court had called a halt under the excellent principle of
suprema lex:interest rei publicae finis ad litem
they didnt ( non ) - it was because the votes were being counted in different ways in the counties of Floridee
so God knows this time
//He started laying the groundwork for this ploy some months ago when he started making noises about election fraud and mail in votes, for which there's never been any evidence. He subsequently installed a crony as head of the postal service to set about hampering it's ability to provide a service for mailed in votes//
Absolutely true. As for his constant obsession with fraud it takes a fraudster .......... it takes one to know one!
Absolutely true. As for his constant obsession with fraud it takes a fraudster .......... it takes one to know one!