Road rules3 mins ago
Positive News On Oxford Vaccine
24 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by tiggerblue10. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.That part surprises me, Pixie -- quite lucky, too, as it supports the Government's approach to delay second jabs, although I think the study is confined to AstraZeneca rather than Pfizer. If true and supported by peer review, it's a gamble that has thankfully paid off. Fingers crossed that this good news continues.
Bobbinwhales I don't see any wrong in wanting to see as much data from the manufactures on their product, before ( I make) a decision. What other people do is their business, I expressed my concerns on the government decision to go against the official guidance from Pfizer on giving the vaccine. Today we know more about the Oxford vac, a lot more data, but still very little that I know to from Pfizer, may be now they will be more forth coming with their data?? It makes perfect sense to me to know as much as possible before accepting a vaccine, but that just my view. But going on what Oxford are saying gives me more confidence in the government decision.
Dont know anyone who wants it to be indefinite but all party leaders and scientists and medical people know we cant release much until spring as under 55s wont have been vaxxed and they account for over 50% of covid icu cases. So relaxing too soon could see hospitals overstretched and wer'e back to square one. Hopefully restraints back by may and football grounds with 50% limits by august. Social distancing advise will still be here for next winter tho unless it's almost irradicated. Not doom and gloom but hopeful of a brighter summer and 2022 if we're patient dave
the business cynic in me is wondering if somebody very senior in Pfizer is even now banging his shoe on the table (historic reference) and yelling "If Astra Zenica have this long gap data they why don't we?????"
Because vaccine that works is vaccine that works and I will take what I am offered but Pfizer strike one is super low temp storage and Pfizer strike two is "no data" on antibody duration between doses......
Because vaccine that works is vaccine that works and I will take what I am offered but Pfizer strike one is super low temp storage and Pfizer strike two is "no data" on antibody duration between doses......
There are dozens of vaccines in various stages of development for Covid, and it's difficult to keep track. But so far almost all Covid Vaccines are based on a two-dose schedule.
Main two-jab vaccines:
AstraZeneca
Pfizer
Moderna
SinoVac
Sputnik
Single-jab:
Johnson and Johnson (still in Phase III stage)
Main two-jab vaccines:
AstraZeneca
Pfizer
Moderna
SinoVac
Sputnik
Single-jab:
Johnson and Johnson (still in Phase III stage)
"The 12 week dalay between jabs has nothing to do with the manufacturers, it is the idea of the govermen to allow everyone to have one vaccination before the second jab is given."
I know Danny but OAZ have published news that their vaccine does have antibody duration from the first dose for 12 weeks and Pfizer seem to be still saying "we have no data"
I know Danny but OAZ have published news that their vaccine does have antibody duration from the first dose for 12 weeks and Pfizer seem to be still saying "we have no data"
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.