Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Cummings
65 Answers
Assertions damning. Matt Hancock in serious trouble.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Paigntonian. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// if he had all the answers, why didn't he speak out at the time.//
on a different council I said that to one of my co-councillors and was told " you say it once and if it is ignored you dont say it again". I had been well and truly shafted by the council chmn
there was of course also the bags of sweeties the council chmn handed out
on a different council I said that to one of my co-councillors and was told " you say it once and if it is ignored you dont say it again". I had been well and truly shafted by the council chmn
there was of course also the bags of sweeties the council chmn handed out
// why didn't he speak out at the time. //
He was Boris’ Advisor so he made his objections to the PM himself.
Publicly rubbishing the Prime Minister would have resulted in him getting the sack. So he concluded that it was better to stay on the inside and have some influence, than have a flounce and be in the wilderness.
He was Boris’ Advisor so he made his objections to the PM himself.
Publicly rubbishing the Prime Minister would have resulted in him getting the sack. So he concluded that it was better to stay on the inside and have some influence, than have a flounce and be in the wilderness.
emmie,
Did you listen to any of the testimony?
You seem to be asking questions which he answered in his evidence.
He claims he considered leaving in March, and then again in May, and then in September. He explained why he didn’t then but acknowledged that he should have gone in September not December.
Did you listen to any of the testimony?
You seem to be asking questions which he answered in his evidence.
He claims he considered leaving in March, and then again in May, and then in September. He explained why he didn’t then but acknowledged that he should have gone in September not December.
Watching this rank liar and hypocrite trying to rubbish another rank liar and hypocrite, I feel like a Liverpool supporter watching Man City play Man Utd - I want the rules changed so that they can both lose.
Can someone enlighten me - is Cumbo's current testimony under oath (or equivalent)? Can he be prosecuted for perjury if he is found to be lying here?
Can someone enlighten me - is Cumbo's current testimony under oath (or equivalent)? Can he be prosecuted for perjury if he is found to be lying here?
emmie its like Gilbert and Sullivan's Pirates
"We go we gooooo"
"yes but you don't go"
https:/ /www.gs archive .net/pi rates/w eb_op/p irates1 6.html
"We go we gooooo"
"yes but you don't go"
https:/