Usually one country (or two) hosts.
But this was a “special” event.
UEFA like Wembley as a venue it would seem so decided the latter stages would be there.
In fact this is largely how the European Championship used to be staged: there were no groups after the qualifying stages, but the semis and final were played in one country.
That’s probably one reason England had never won a knockout game on neutral territory : there didn’t used to be many until 1984, when it became a 16 team event with quarter finals etc
thanks, ichkeria. I thought it made sense to stage matches all over Europe (which isn't such a big place) but was surprised at least one of the semis didn't go elsewhere. It's helped England, but that's fortuitous.
It did seem a bit questionable that England got to play their round of 16 game at Wembley. One venue (Dublin) withdrew leaving only 11. So one host got two of the 12 last 16/last 8 games
Remarkable that "how advantage" only has an effect when England appear to benefit from it. 1966 and 2021 for instance. It was not mentioned when we had tournaments here and did poorly mind. Uruguay 1930, Italy 1934 & 1968, Spain 1964, Germany 1974, Argentina 1978, France 1984 & 1998. All winning teams that hosted the tournaments. The peevish and churlish will have to get over themselves.
P.S. Our best performance has been 4-0 against Ukraine ... in Rome.
England didn’t deign to enter the WC until 1950.
Argentina 1978 was the one obvious occasion I can think of when it wouldn’t surprise me if something dodgy had been going on.
But they were a top side.
Just not as good as the Netherlands :-)
Actually home advantage hasn’t really counted for much in recent years and I’m not altogether sure it’s helping England all that much.